BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. Mahadevan, J. Sathya Narayana Prasad, JJ.
M. Swaminathan and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu Through its Chief Secretary and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (MD) No. 26139 of 2022 and W.M.P. (MD) No. 20295 of 2022
Decided On : 25-01-2023
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 226, 227, 32, 136, 323-A or Article 323-B, 14, 15 and 16 - NGT Act - Sections 20, 15 , 22 and 14 - Civil Procedure Code,1908 - Section 100 - Ecological significance of water bodies - Violation of the principles of natural justice - Orders of allotment representations were made for some more allotment - Second respondent, after making an intense study, had written a letter recommending to make allotment of house sites in land - Held, Original application was filed before the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench - Pertinent to refer to latest order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh and others were not parties before Tribunal and appellants before Apex Court they are entitled to order - Writ petition is allowed
ORDER :
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
The petitioners have come forward with this writ petition assailing the order dated 23.08.2021 passed by the Principal Bench of the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi, (in short, "the Tribunal") in O.A. No. 125 of 2021.
2. The third respondent herein has filed O.A. No. 125 of 2021 before the Tribunal challenging the orders passed by the Government of Tamil Nadu viz., G.O. (Ms). No. 76 and G.O. (Ms). No. 77, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing [LD1(2)] Department, dated 28.02.2019 and G.O. (Ms). No. 329 dated 02.07.2020 alleging that a water body namely "Pudukulam Kanmoi" has been allotted to certain journalists as house sites. The Tribunal, after hearing the applicant/third respondent therein and the respondents/Government, disposed of the said application, by order dated 23.08.2021, the relevant passage of which is extracted below for ready reference:
14. Accordingly, we allow this application and direct the State of Tamil Nadu to restore water body known as Pudukulam Kanmoiin Survey Nos. 134/2 and 134/2A1 in Pudukulam Kanmoi of Thallakulam Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District, Tamil Nadu to its original position removing the construction, if any, raised thereon, within one month.
The application is disposed of.
A copy of this order be forwarded to the Chief Secretary, Tamil Nadu and District Magistrate, Madurai by e-mail for compliance."
The aforesaid order of the Tribunal is challenged in this writ petition by the petitioners herein, who are beneficiaries of the orders of allotment issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu.
3.(i) Mr. Ajmal Khan, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the Tribunal, without hearing the petitioners herein, who are beneficiaries of the allotment of house site, has passed the order dated 23.08.2021 impugned herein, which is in violation of the principles of natural justice. In fact, the petitioners have filed an application to implead themselves as parties to the aforesaid application viz., O.A. No. 125 of 2021, but it was rejected. Therefore, on this ground alone, the learned senior counsel sought to set aside the order impugned in this writ petition.
(ii) Adding further, the learned senior counsel submitted that even in the year 1997, the Government has taken a policy decision and issued G.O. Ms. No.573 Revenue [LD-1(2)] Department dated 18.06.1997 allotting the lands in Old Survey No.134/4 and New Survey No.134/2A1, Thallakulam Village, Madurai measuring an extent of 3.70 acres to 61 members of Madurai Press Club Association. Pursuant to such allotment, the allottees have constructed residential houses and are residing. Subsequently, following the orders of allotment made in the year 1997, representations were made for some more allotment. By considering the said representations, the second respondent, after making an intense study, had written a letter dated 26.12.2006, recommending to make allotment of house sites in the land in Survey No.134/2A1 of Th
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India [(1997) 3 SCC 261] : 1997 SCC (L&S) 577
L. Chandrakumar v. Union of India [(2014) 10 SCC 1]
Mantri Techzone Pvt Ltd., v. Forward Foundation and others
Sanjana M. Wig v. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.
The National Green Tribunal must comply with principles of natural justice, ensuring parties have the opportunity to present their case before any adverse decisions are made.
The court emphasized the importance of adherence to the principles of natural justice and the right to be heard, especially in cases involving civil consequences, and highlighted the violation of the....
In all matters falling with the ambit of the National Green Tribunal, it is only the jurisdiction of the National Green Tribunal which can be invoked; and the petitioners should not be permitted to i....
(1) Court cannot be permitted to usurp functions assigned to the Executive, Legislature or subordinate legislature – Courts cannot issue directions to Legislature for enacting laws in a particular ma....
Court confirmed the mandatory requirement of gap analysis for the establishment of new biomedical waste facilities, emphasizing jurisdictional limitations on appellate authority and the importance of....
The National Green Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 16 permits aggrieved parties to challenge environmental clearances to ensure compliance with ecological protection standards.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.