State of Himachal Pradesh vs Yogendera Mohan Sengupta

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(SC) 37

B. R. GAVAI, ARAVIND KUMAR
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Yogendera Mohan Sengupta – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rishi Malhotra, AOR Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rahul Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, AOR Ms. Itisha Awasthi, Adv. Ms. Sanjana Grace Thomas, Adv. Ms. Tara Elizabeth Kurien, Adv. Mr. P.V. Surendranath,Sr.Adv. Mr. Subhash Chandran K.R.,Adv. Mr. Biju P Raman, AOR Ms. Krishna L.R.,Adv. Mr. John Thomas Arakal,Adv. Mr. Sawan Kumar Shukla,Adv. Ms. Lekha Sudhakar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR Mr. Subodh Kr. Pathak, Adv. Mr. Shashi Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Akash Swami, Adv. Mr. V. Elangovan, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR
Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Mr. Rahul Choudhary, Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Ms. Itisha Awasthi, Ms. Sanjana Grace Thomas, Ms. Tara Elizabeth Kurien, Mr. P.V. Surendranath, Mr. Subhash Chandran K.R., Mr. Biju P Raman, Ms. Krishna L.R., John Thomas Arakal, Mr. Sawan Kumar Shukla, Ms. Lekha Sudhakar, Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. Subodh Kr. Pathak, Mr. Shashi Ranjan, Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Mr. Akash Swami, Mr. V. Elangovan, Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

B.R. Gavai, J.

	INDEX
I	INTRODUCTION
II.	FACTS
III.	SUBMISSIONS
IV.	CONSIDERATION
	A.	Legislative Scheme of the TCP Act.
	B.	Nature of functions/powers of the Authorities under Chapter-IV of the TCP Act.
	C.	Whether the NGT could have issued directions to the legislative body to exercise its legislative functions in a particular manner?
	D.	Whether observations in Para 47 of the Mantri Techzone Private Limited (supra) would operate as res judicata?
	E.	Development Plan 2041.
	F.	Whether the NGT was justified in passing the order dated 14th October 2022 when the High Court was seized of the same issue during the pendency of Civil Writ Petition No.5960 of 2022?
	G.	Balancing the need for Development and Protection of the Environment.
V.	CONCLUSION

I. INTRODUCTION

Civil Appeal Nos. 5348-5349 OF 2019

1. These appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 16th November 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the "first order of NGT") passed by the National Green Trib

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(SC) 37

B. R. GAVAI, ARAVIND KUMARState of Himachal Pradesh – AppellantVersusYogendera Mohan Sengupta – Respondent

Cases Referred (61)

B. R. GAVAI, ARAVIND KUMAR
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Yogendera Mohan Sengupta – Respondent