IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. SUBRAMANIAN, SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, JJ.
The Director of School Education, Chennai & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
S. Bhaskar - Respondent
W.A. No. 1628 of 2018
Decided On : 01-02-2023
Service Law - Appointment as Junior Assistant - Issue relating to eligibility fixed by Teachers Recruitment Board – Held, Court do not think that any right would accrue to respondent – amendment introduced is made specifically retrospective, that is from date of issuance of G.O – Unless respondent is able to demonstrate that he had requisite qualification viz., a pass in X Standard after undergoing 10 years of regular schooling and a pass in XII Standard after undergoing 2 years of regular schooling and a graduate degree after completing 3 years of course study coupled with B.Ed., or B.Lit., is alone be entitled to employment as a teacher – Respondent has not passed in XII Standard before he had completed his degree – Writ petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
R. Subramanian, J.
[Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 11.12.2017 made in W.P.No.11517 of 2012.]
The Director of School Education is on appeal aggrieved by the order of the writ Court setting aside the proceedings dated 12.04.2012, in and by which, the promotion granted to the respondent as Tamil Pandit on 12.03.2012 was withdrawn on the ground that the petitioner was not qualified.
2. The respondent who was working as a Junior Assistant in the Census Department, on retrenchment, was appointed as Junior Assistant in the education department on 01.03.2004 and his services were regularized on 10.11.2009. The respondent has passed his SSLC (X Standard) in 1980 and thereafter appeared for his Higher Secondary (XII Standard) Examination conducted in April 1982. He was not successful, having failed in Mathematics. However, the respondent completed B.Lit., from Alagappa University in 2007 and also completed M.A. Tamil in 2011. Thereafter, he appeared again in the Supplementary Examination conducted in September 2010 and cleared the Mathematics paper also.
3. The Department offered for promotion of clerical staff as teachers provided they had the prescribed qualification and 2% reservation was made for such promotions. The respondent applied for such promotion and he was promoted on 12.03.2012. Subsequently, the Department realized that the promotion of the respondent was not in consonance with the relevant Rules, since G.O.No.107 dated 18.08.2009 which governs the issue specifically provides that only persons who had obtained degrees in Open University system after having passed in the Higher Secondary Examination would be considered to be holding a valid graduation degree to enable them to seek employment in the State's services. The said Government Order reads as follows:-
4. Since it was found that the promotion given to the respondent was in violation of the Government Order, the Department recalled the order of promotion on 12.04.2012. It is this order which is subject matter of challenge before the writ Court.
5. The writ Court had allowed the writ petition relying upon the judgment in J. Joseph Irudayaraj Vs. Joint Director of School Education, Chennai. Though the writ Court referred to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Annamalai University Vs. Secretary to Government reported in (2009) 4 SCC 590, it was sought to be distinguished on the ground that it related to the Post Graduate degree obtained though Open University system without obtaining Under Graduate degree.
6. The learned Special Government Pleader would contend that the issue involved is covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board Vs. A. Valarmathi and others in W.A.Nos.1496 to 1498 of 2015 dated 21.08.2018 to which one of us (Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subramanian) was a party. In the said judgment the Division Bench had considered the issue relating to eligibility fixed by the Teachers Recruitment Board. As per the Rules, the qualification for secondary grade teacher is a graduate in any of the subjects with B.Ed., or B.Lit.,. Such graduation must have been obtained after completion of 12 years of regular school education and having secured a pass in Higher Secondary School Examination.
7. Various attempts have been made by persons to secure employment as teachers by obtaining degrees in different shortcut methods. All these methods were dealt with by this Court in R. Thirunavukkara
Point of law : Court cannot substitute the statutory qualification, which is not otherwise provided under the relevant provisions, which prescribe the essential qualification for appointment to the p....
The Supreme Court ruled that B.Ed. is not a valid qualification for primary school teachers, affecting eligibility for appointments made after its decision.
Eligibility criteria for promotion must be met, and invalid qualifications disqualify candidates from holding positions, even on an ad hoc basis.
The State's authority to determine the equivalence of degrees for public employment and the importance of adhering to prescribed educational qualifications for teaching posts.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.