Back
R. SUBRAMANIAN, V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Chief Engineer, (Agricultural Engineering), Chennai – Appellant
Versus
T. Arjunan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure to review the order dated 12.07.2018 made in W.A.No.52 of 2017 passed by the Division Bench.)
R.Subramanian, J.
1. Mr.R.Murugesan, Chief Engineer (AE), Agricultural Engineering Department one of the contemners is present in person.
2. The review is sought for on the sole ground that the petitioner in the writ petition has attained the age of superannuation on the date when the Division Bench passed orders for his reinstatement.
3. This is an unfortunate case where the temporary worker was shown the door on 01.04.1990, despite the fact that he had qualified for permanent appointment on the said date. He made several representations to various Authorities. Since they did not evoke a positive response, he approached the Labour Officer, Conoor seeking conciliation on 15.10.1993. The said proceeding was terminated on the ground that no conciliation was possible. The respondent herein again made a representation seeking permanency and since that application was kept pending he filed WP.No.9045 of 1999 before this Court and the same was transferred to the Tamil Nadu Ad
Continuous pursuit of rights and entitlement to regularization notionally with all service and financial benefits.
Employment rights must consider the evolution of employment circumstances, not just initial appointment terms; regularization claims post-superannuation lack merit without available positions.
Recognition and weightage of specific court orders in matters of service regularization and retirement benefits.
Long-serving employees must be granted retirement benefits despite lack of regularization, highlighting the obligation of employers to acknowledge years of service and fairness.
Review Petition – While exercising review jurisdiction, Court has to first satisfy itself on any error apparent on face of record which calls for exercise of review jurisdiction – Review jurisdiction....
Point of law : Service Law – Regularization of service -When appellant had allowed order to become final, he cannot seek for regularization contrary to the said order - l
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
