IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
J. Shanthi – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Chennai & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4142 of 2020 & WMP.No. 4902 of 2020
Decided On : 01-08-2023
Pension Rules 1978 - Family Pension - Court directs inclusion of petitioner's name in beneficiaries list and settlement of pension arrears
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's husband died while in service, and the 5th respondent refused to grant family pension to the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules 1978.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the 4th respondent to send a fresh proposal to the Government for the inclusion of the petitioner's name in the list of beneficiaries and settle the pension arrears within six months.
Issues: Refusal of family pension to the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules 1978.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the petitioner was entitled to family pension under the Pension Rules and directed the authorities to include the petitioner's name in the beneficiaries list and settle the pension arrears.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with directions to include the petitioner's name in the beneficiaries list and settle the pension arrears within six months.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order issued by the 5th respondent in proceedings Mu.Mu.No.34933/Na.O.Sa (3)/2016 dated 27.12.2016 and quash the order and consequently direct the respondents to grant family pension and other consequential pensionary benefits to the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules 1978 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum with effect from the date of death of petitioner''s husband on 22.03.2016 with all consequential service and monetary benefits.)
1. The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarifed Mandamus to quash the impugned order issued by the 5th respondent in proceedings Mu.Mu.No.34933/Na.O.Sa (3)/2016 dated 27.12.2016 and consequently direct the respondents to grant family pension and other consequential pensionary benefits to the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules 1978 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum with effect from the date of death of petitioner''s husband on 22.03.2016 with all consequential service and monetary benefits.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that her husband was initially appointed as NMR on daily wages in the 4th respondent Municipality on full time basis in the year 1986. Based on G.O.Ms.No.101 Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department dated 30.04.1997 & G.O.Ms.No.71 Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department dated 05.05.1998 the petitioner''s husband was appointed in the regular vacant post of Sanitary Worker in the 4th respondent Municipality on consolidated pay with effect from 09.06.1998 and subsequently he was brought into regular time scale of pay with effect from 09.06.1999. The petitioner''s husband died while in service on 22.03.2016. The 5th respondent issued the impugned orders refusing to grant family pension to the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules 1978. Hence, the present Writ Petition.
3. Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Advocate General – II Assisted by Mr.T.Chezhiyan, learned Additional Government Pleader furnished a copy of the letter (3P) No.02, dated 08.03.2023 of the Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Fort St.George, Chennai addressed to the Director of Local Fund Audit, Chennai and the relevant paragraphs 9 & 10 of the said letter are worth extracting.
4. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of on the following directions:-
(i) the 4th respondent is directed to send a fresh proposal to the Government through the Commissioner of Municipal Administration for the inclusion of the petitioner''s name in the list of beneficiaries within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such receipt of the proposal, the first respondent shall consider the same to include the petitioner''s name in the beneficiaries list.
(ii) the pension arrears consequent to the order passed by the first respondent dated 08.03.2023 shall be settled to the petitioner and the above said exercises shall be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Entitlement to family pension under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules 1978.
The legal principle established is that government authorities are obligated to process pension claims in a timely manner, ensuring that eligible applicants receive their entitled benefits without un....
The conscious actions and representations of the deceased employee regarding the family pension benefit influenced the court's decision on the petitioner's entitlement to family pension.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules and relevant government orders, a petitioner may not be eligible for further family pension if they are alr....
The court mandated adherence to prescribed formats for pension benefit applications, allowing re-submission with required documentation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.