SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2597

R. MAHADEVAN, MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
R. Balakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
V. M. Sumathy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:T.C.S. Raja Chockalingam for R.C. Srinivasan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1 & R3, N. Nagu Sah, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the fair and decreetal order dated 08.11.2022 in Appln.No.4540 of 2021 in E.P.176 of 2018 in C.S.No.793 of 2007.)Mohammed Shaffiq, J.

1. These two appeals are filed challenging the order of the learned Judge dated 08.11.2022 passed in Appln.No.4540 of 2021 whereby the appellants herein were directed to vacate and hand over possession of the suit schedule property on or before 31.12.2022, failing which, the learned Master should pass necessary orders in E.P.No.176 of 2018, and to ensure that the appellants do indeed vacate the premises and adhere to the compromise, which was entered into before the Lok Adalat.

1.1. The above order of the learned Judge is challenged by Mr.R.Balakrishnan and Mr.R.Boopathy in the present appeals viz., O.S.A.Nos.318 and 324 respectively. For ease of reference, we shall refer to them as the appellants 1 and 2 individually and as appellants collectively. Mrs.V.M.Sumathy, sister of the appellants is the 1st Respondent in both the appeals, while Mrs.Soundarammal, mother of the parties is the 3rd respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top