Description of Festival
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
Maiva Pharma Employees Union, Krishnagiri – Appellant
Versus
Joint Director Industrial Safety & Health, Hosur & Others – Respondents
W.P. NO. 2247 OF 2023 & W.M.P. NOS. 2328, 2330 & 2332 Of 2023
Decided On : 13-09-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed challenging the unilateral holiday declarations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding consultative processes and employee rights. (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 22) |
| 3. examination of relevant provisions of the act and rationale. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 4. conclusion reaffirming the invalidity of festival holidays on existing holidays. (Para 52 , 60) |
| 5. final decision mandating changes to holiday declarations. (Para 68 , 70 , 72) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records from the 2nd respondent Deputy Director, Industrial Safety and Health, Hosur, relating to the order dated 12.01.2023 bearing reference Na.Ka. N.24/2023 and N.Pa.Mu/A/30/2023 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary , without jurisdiction and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to declare the festival days suggested by the petitioner Union under Rule 4 of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Rules, 1959 as the festival holidays.)
1. Assailing the order passed by the 2nd respondent in approving the list of festival holidays submitted by the 3rd respondent as arbitrary, illegal and for a consequential direction to declare the days mentioned in Annexure ‘A’ as festival holidays, as suggested by the petitioner, the present petition has been filed.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent is engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products and employs 125 workers; 50 workers were termed as Management Trainees; 100 workers are termed as Contract Labourers; 50 fixed term employees and about 450 staff are working in the 3rd respondent.
3. It is the further case of the petitioner that Sunday is a holiday with the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent is registered under the Factories Act, 1948 and is covered under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) Act, 1958 (for short ‘the Act’). It is the case of the petitioner that Section 3 of the Act contemplates 4 national holidays, whether it falls on a Sunday or not. That apart, the employees are entitled to 5 festival holidays.
4. It is the further case of the petitioner that before finalizing the 5 festival holidays, the 2nd respondent, in consultation with the employer and employees may specify the 5 festival days, which could be treated as holidays. It is the further case of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent, without consultation, suggested the following 5 festival holidays for the year 2023, of which 3 festival days fall on a Sunday, which by itself is a holiday :-
| S. No. | Description of Festival | Date & Day |
| 1 | Pongal | 15.01.2023 – Sunday |
| 2 | Tamil New Year | 14.04.2023 – Friday |
| 3 | VinayakarChathurthi | 17.09.2023 – Sunday |
| 4 | Vijaya Dasami | 24.10.2023 – Tuesday |
| 5 | Deepavali | 12.11.2023 - Sunday |
5. It is the further case of the petitioner that on 20.12.2022, the petitioner sent a representation to the 3rd respondent requesting it to consult the employees in compliance of Rule 3 of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (National & Festival Holidays) Rules, 1959 (for short ‘the Rules’). However, the 3rd respondent, without consulting the employees and displaying its proposal in the manner specified under Rule 3, unilaterally displayed Form V by choosing the festival days in such a way that 3 of them fell on Sunday, which otherwise is a holiday. Therefore, the Union sent a representation dated 27.12.2022 to the 1st respondent and suggested the following 5 days:-
| S. No. | Description of Festival | Date & Day |
| 1 | Pongal | 16.01.2023 – Sunday |
| 2 | Tamil New Year | 14.04.2023 – Friday |
| 3 | VinayakarChathurthi | 22.09.2023 – Sunday |
| 4 | Vijaya Dasami | 24.10.2023 – Tuesday |
| 5 | Deepavali | 13.11.2023 - Sunday |
6. It is the furthe
Festival holidays cannot be declared on days already classified as holidays unless proper consultative processes are adhered to.
The management's obligation to pay wages for national holidays is contingent on the employee's availability for work; if workmen are on strike, they cannot claim such wages.
Temporary employees under the Kalelkar Award are entitled to the same holiday benefits and overtime pay as permanent employees, regardless of government circulars to the contrary.
The main legal point established is that 'round-the-clock shift workers' are entitled to the benefit under Section 5(2)(b) of the Act, even if the declared holiday falls on another holiday.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for caution and circumspection in pursuing Public Interest Litigations, and the court's authority to dismiss petitions as a patent abuse o....
Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, permits recovery of money only if the entitlement is pre-existing and previously adjudicated; employees must demonstrate a pre-existing right and....
An employer performing non-sovereign functions must comply with the Industrial Disputes Act, including provisions for retrenchment, regardless of the employment's casual nature.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a pre-existing right and entitlement of the employees as a prerequisite for entertaining a Claim Petition under Section 33 (C....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.