Back
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Kannaian Naidu (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Kamsala Ammal @ Banumathi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
PRAYER in S.A. No. 59 of 2016: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2015 passed in A.S. No. 1 of 2007 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Chidambaram in modifying the judgment and decree dated 15.09.2005 passed in O.S. No. 28 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram.
PRAYER in Cross Objection No. 26 of 2017: Cross Objection filed under Order XLI Rule 22 of C.P.C. praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2015 made in A.S. No. 1 of 2007 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Chidambaram in so far as it relates to partly reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S. No. 28 of 2002 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram.
1. Second Appeal has been filed by the against the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2015 made in A.S. No. 1 of 2007 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Chidambaram in modifying the judgment and decree dated 15.09.2005 passed in O.S. No. 28 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram.
1.1 Cross Objection filed under Order XLI Rule 22 of C.P.C. praying to set aside the judgm
Benami Transactions – Property purchased by husband – Contribution of wife directly or indirectly, she has right over the property acquired by husband.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act and the burden of proof required to establish joint family properties. The judgment als....
The judicial presumption of joint ownership requires proof of a family nucleus, and mere existence of a joint family does not automatically classify all properties as joint.
Claims of property ownership must be substantiated with credible evidence, as allegations of trust do not override the Benami Transactions Act without proof of fraud.
The burden of proving a benami transaction rests on the party asserting the plea, and the defendants failed to discharge this burden.
The property purchased in a female's name is presumed self-acquired unless proven otherwise; claims under the Benami Act require appropriate pleadings and evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
