Back
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
P. Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
A. Bhuvaneshwari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the fair and decretal award passed by the learned Principle Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) dated 30.8.2022 in MCOP 8/2019.)
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed for enhancement of compensation granted by the award dated 30.08.2022 made in MCOP.No.8 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam.
2. The appellant is the claimant in MCOP.No.8 of 2019 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam. He filed the above said claim petition, claiming a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation for the injuries sustained by him in an accident that took place on 08.12.2016.
3. The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of the 1st respondent and directed the 2nd respondent, insurance company to pay a sum of Rs.4,60,076/- as compensation to the appellant.
4. Not being satisfied with the amount awarded by the Tribunal, the appellant has come out
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the multiplier method for determining compensation for disability and the court's authority to enhance compensation based on the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to enhance compensation based on the cost of living and legal precedents.
The main legal point established is the proper assessment of disability, notional income, and application of legal precedents in determining compensation.
In motor accident claims, disability percentage assessed by Medical Board must be adopted if it affects lifelong earning capacity; arbitrary reduction by Tribunal without basis is erroneous, warranti....
The court applied the Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SARLA VERMA & OTHER v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Another to determine the loss o....
The Court applied the multiplier method and adjusted notional income based on legal precedents to determine fair compensation for disability and loss of earnings.
The court has the authority to modify the compensation awarded by the Tribunal based on the evidence and nature of the injury suffered by the appellant.
The assessment of disability and determination of compensation should consider the multiplier method and relevant Supreme Court judgments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
