RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN
Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Kadhar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 13.12.2018 made in MCOP No.761 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Court at Sankagiri.)
1. Both the appeals arise out of the same award and same accident hence disposed of by this common judgment. Parties are referred to as per their ranking in the claim petition for the sake of convenience.
2. CMA No.2971 of 2019 has been filed by the claim petitioner seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in MCOP No.761 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub-Court, Sankagiri.
3. CMA No.2532 of 2023 has been filed by the Insurance Company challenging the very same award on the point of liability as well as quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
4. By the Administrative Order of My Lord, The Hon'ble Chief Justice, both the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are posted before this court.
5. The factum of accident, manner of accident, rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the vehicle belonging to the first respondent and insured with the second respondent are not in dispute. Accordingly, th
The court applied the Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SARLA VERMA & OTHER v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Another to determine the loss o....
The assessment of disability, nature of injuries, and calculation of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act were central to the court's decision.
The court emphasized that compensation for injuries must comprehensively address all aspects, including loss of income during treatment, ensuring just and reasonable awards.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the multiplier method for determining compensation for disability and the court's authority to enhance compensation based on the....
The court has the authority to modify the compensation awarded by the Tribunal based on the evidence and nature of the injury suffered by the appellant.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to enhance compensation based on the cost of living and legal precedents.
In motor accident claims, disability percentage assessed by Medical Board must be adopted if it affects lifelong earning capacity; arbitrary reduction by Tribunal without basis is erroneous, warranti....
The appellate court enhanced compensation due to inadequate initial damages despite claimant's failure to fully substantiate loss of income or future medical expenses.
The court has the authority to enhance compensation if it deems the awarded amount to be meagre.
The court has the authority to enhance compensation if it deems the awarded amount to be meager and can direct the Insurance Company to deposit the determined amount with accrued interest to the cred....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.