IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S. Ramesh, Sunder Mohan, JJ.
Sudha Velmani – Petitioner
Versus
The State rep by its, The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department – Respondent
W.P. No. 2427 of 2024
Decided On : 11-03-2024
Mandamus - Grant of Ordinary Leave - The court directed the prison authorities to grant ordinary leave to the convict prisoner for a period of 20 days without escort, considering the petitioner's representation and the Probation Officer's positive report.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition to direct the respondents to grant 40 days ordinary leave to the convict/petitioner's brother, who was confined at Central Prison, Trichy.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's brother was entitled to ordinary leave despite the pendency of an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, and directed the prison authorities to grant ordinary leave for a period of 20 days without escort.
Issues: The issues involved the eligibility for ordinary leave, objections raised by the respondents, and the pendency of the appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Rule 20 Sub Rule 1(i) of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, which provides for the grant of ordinary leave to a prisoner for making arrangements for the livelihood of his/her family, and the Probation Officer's positive report to grant ordinary leave to the convict prisoner.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the court directed the prison authorities to grant ordinary leave to the convict prisoner for a period of 20 days without escort.
JUDGMENT :
M.S. Ramesh, J.
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant 40 days leave to the convict/petitioner's brother namely Mr.Sakthi @ Sakthivel S/o.Palanisamy aged about 42 years in pursuance of the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2024.)
1. This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to grant 40 days ordinary leave to the petitioner's brother/Convict Prisoner namely Sakthi @ Sakhivel S/o. Palanisamy aged about 42 years, Convict No.23598, confined at Central Prison, Trichy by considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2024.
2. Through earlier orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.26199 of 2023, the petitioner's brother was granted ordinary leave from 10.11.2023 to 30.11.2023 with a condition that the cost of the escort was to be borne by the petitioner herein.
3. In the subsequent modification petition filed, the cost was restricted to a maximum of Rs.20,000/-. The present grievance of the petitioner is that when she had sought for subsequent leave for her brother based on her representation dated 03.01.2024, the respondents had raised objections, stating that she was eligible for leave since an appeal was pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and also that she had failed to pay the cost of the escort.
4. In so far as the pendency of the appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which is quoted as an embargo for grant of ordinary leave is concerned, a Coordinate Bench of this Court through its order dated 29.09.2023 passed in W.P.(MD).No.6398 of 2023, in the case of Latha vs. Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Madurai, had directed the respondents therein to re-consider the petitioner's leave application, without reference to the pendency of the criminal appeal petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Moreover, Rule 20 Sub Rule 1(i) of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules provides for the grant of ordinary leave to a prisoner for making arrangements for the livelihood of his/her family for the settlement of life from the release. It would be pertinent to point out that Rule 20 (vii) of the Rules provides for grant of ordinary leave to a prisoner for "any extraordinary reason".
5. In the light of the aforesaid order passed, we are inclined to grant leave to the petitioner's brother/Convict Prisoner, even though an appeal is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Now that the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.20,000/- as ordered in W.M.P.No.4201 of 2024 in W.P.No.26119 of 2023, the respondents may not have any grievance over this objection also.
6. Mr.E.Raj Thilak, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, has produced the copy of the Probation Officer's report dated 27.02.2024, in which the Probation Officer had made favourable recommendation for grant of leave to the petitioner's brother for the present spell. He further submitted that the petitioner's brother/Life Convict would otherwise be entitled for ordinary leave for 20 days.
7. In consideration of the reasons for which the ordinary leave is sought for and in exercise of our powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and by also by taking into consideration of the Probation Officer's positive report, there shall be a direction to the prison authorities to grant ordinary leave to the petitioner's brother/Convict Prisoner i.e. Sakthi @ Sakthivel S/o.Palanisamy, aged about 42 years, bearing Convict No.23598 confined at Central Prison, Trichy, for a period of 20 days without escort, on the following conditions.
(i) Respondents are directed to release the Convict Prisoner viz., Sakthi @ Sakthivel S/o.Palanisamy, aged about 42 years, bearing Convict No.23598 confined at Central Prison, Trichy, on ordinary leave for a period of 20 days i.e., from 14.03.2024 to 02.04.2024.
(ii) The Convict Prisoner shall be released on 14.03.2024 at 10.00 a.m. and surrender before the Superintendent of Prison, Trichy Central Prison,
AI
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the pendency of an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court does not necessarily bar the grant of ordinary leave to a convict prisoner, espe....
The court may grant ordinary leave to a convict prisoner where the refusal grounds lack factual basis and the prisoner has a record of good conduct, especially when humanitarian grounds like care for....
The Court holds that conditions of ordinary leave for convicts, specifically the requirement of police escort, may be set aside where such conditions impose disproportionate financial hardship on the....
The court has the discretion to grant leave to a convict based on eligibility and the likelihood of law and order issues, and may impose conditions on the leave granted.
The pendency of criminal cases against a convict prisoner does not serve as an absolute bar to the grant of ordinary leave under prison regulations.
The court can grant leave to a convict prisoner based on favorable recommendations from a Probation Officer, despite inaccuracies in the leave application.
Past disciplinary infractions, such as absconding while on leave, do not create a perpetual bar against future leave eligibility if the prisoner has demonstrated consistent compliance and good conduc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.