Back
ANITA SUMANTH, R. VIJAYAKUMAR
Sasikala – Appellant
Versus
M. Selvaraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition and property ownership contributions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. response against contributions claims. (Para 8 , 10 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. trial court's decision on contributions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. salary comparison of parties' contributions. (Para 17 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. diary entries indicating contributions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. application of section 45 of the t.p. act. (Para 32 , 35 , 36 , 76) |
| 7. evidence and contributions discussed. (Para 37 , 62 , 63) |
| 8. burden of proof in partition suits. (Para 70 , 72 , 73) |
| 9. final decision and order. (Para 99) |
JUDGMENT :
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
PRAYER :- Appeal Suit - filed under Section 96 with Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2013 in O.S.No. 81 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli and allow this appeal with the costs.
The appellant was the plaintiff in O.S.No.81 of 2012 filed seeking relief of partition and separate possession of her half share in the properties at New Ward – D, Block No.40, T.S.No.153, Old Municipal Ward No.2, Block No.39, T.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
