ANITA SUMANTH, R. VIJAYAKUMAR
Sasikala – Appellant
Versus
M. Selvaraj – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
PRAYER :- Appeal Suit - filed under Section 96 with Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2013 in O.S.No. 81 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli and allow this appeal with the costs.
The appellant was the plaintiff in O.S.No.81 of 2012 filed seeking relief of partition and separate possession of her half share in the properties at New Ward – D, Block No.40, T.S.No.153, Old Municipal Ward No.2, Block No.39, T.S.No.210 Vamadam Palla Street, Thennur, Trichirapalli (in short ‘suit property’) by metes and bounds.
2. The submissions of the appellant represented by Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar are as follows. The parties had been married on 30.08.1990 and the appellant had secured employment in the passport office in 1993. The suit property had been purchased on 10.12.1997 under document No.3750 of 1997. The registration of the document was admittedly in the name of the defendant only and it is the appellant’s case that she had contributed equally towards the cost of the same.
3. The couple had co
Gannmani Anasuya and others V. Parvatini amarendra Chowdhary and others
C.R.Ramaswami Ayyangar V. C.S.Rangachariar
C.V.Ramaswami Naidu and ors. V. C.S.Shyamala Devi and ors
Dr.Gurmukh Ram Madan V. Bhagwan Das Madan
Dayanand Rajan and another V. Ram Lal Khattar
Marcel Martins V. M.Printer and others
Mangathai Ammal (died) through legal representatives and others V. Rajeswari and others
Mohan Lal V. Board of Revenue, U.P., Allahabad and others
R.Vishwanathan V. Rukn-ul-Mukh Syed Abdul Wajid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.