Back
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
L Muniratnam S/o L. Narasimhulu – Appellant
Versus
P. S. Girisha IAS P. S. Girisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of contempt case under statutory provisions. (Para 1) |
| 2. compliance with prior court order negates need for adjudication. (Para 2) |
| 3. contempt case closed without costs. (Para 3) |
ORDER :
The above contempt case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents alleging non-implementation of the order dated 10.12.2018 passed by this Court in W.P.No.25810 of 2012.
2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 10.12.2018 passed by this court in W.P.No.25810 of 2012 has been complied with and nothing survives for adjudication.
3. In view of the said submissions, the above contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with court orders is crucial in contempt cases.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act.
A contempt petition may be rendered moot by subsequent orders that alter the obligations imposed by earlier court rulings.
Compliance with court orders as a fundamental obligation under contempt law is upheld.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
