Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
D. Mahalingam – Appellant
Versus
T. Prabhu Sankar – Respondent
ORDER :
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
[PRAYER: Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, pleased to issue notice to the respondents; Punish the respondents for having disobeyed the order dated 14.07.2023 of this Court passed in W.P.No.20938 of 2023.]
The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 6 would submit that pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, an enquiry has been conducted and the order of this Court has been complied with. Thus, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
A contempt petition may be rendered moot by subsequent orders that alter the obligations imposed by earlier court rulings.
Compliance with court orders is essential; acknowledgment of compliance by both parties leads to closure of contempt petitions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
