SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
S. Kuppusamy - Petitioner
Versus
The Directorate, Town and Country Planning, Salem and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.No.613 of 2022 and WMP.No.663 of 2022
Decided On : 01-10-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. T. Mohan, Senior Counsel for Mr. MA.P. Thangavel.
For the Respondents: Mr. V. Manoharan, Additional Government Pleader, Mr. M. Alagu Goutham, Mr. Mohammed Riyaz for Mr. S. Senthil.

Poultry farming is classified as an agricultural activity exempt from planning permission under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 - Section 2(1-A) - Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Section 2(1) and 2(13) - Writ petition for mandamus to restrain poultry farm operation without permission - Court found poultry farming as agricultural activity exempt from planning permission under relevant laws. (Paras 10, 12, 14)

(B) Planning Permission - Requirement - Court ruled that agricultural activities, including poultry farming, do not constitute development requiring planning permission, overriding conflicting provisions of the Panchayats Act. (Paras 10, 14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner owns agricultural lands and sought to prevent respondents from operating a poultry farm without necessary permissions, citing violations of local regulations. Respondents claimed exemption from such permissions as their activities fell under agricultural use.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that poultry farming is an agricultural activity and does not require planning permission under the Town and Country Planning Act.

Issues: Whether poultry farming constitutes agriculture requiring planning permission and if the petitioner is entitled to relief.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that poultry farming is included in the definition of agriculture and thus exempt from planning permissions, as per the Town and Country Planning Act.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

ORDER :

(G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J.)

(PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 forbearing the respondents 6 & 7 to operate the Poultry farm in SF.No.256/2 in K Pudhupalayam, Kuttalambarai Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal District, without obtaining the necessary permission from the competent authority by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2021.)

This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents 1 to 5 to forbear respondents 6 & 7 to run the poultry farm situated at SF.No.256/2 in K Pudhupalayam, Kuttalambarai Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal District.

A) FACTUAL DETAILS

2. The petitioner owns agricultural lands comprised in SF.Nos.140/4C-4B, 167/1A2-1A1, 167/5C2-5C1 in Madakasampatty Village and SF.Nos.308/2, 255/2A-3A-3B, 257/3A1-3A2-2B1-2B2 in Kuttalambarai Village in Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal District. For the said lands, the petitioner was issued patta and constructed house after obtaining planning permission to an extent of 1157 sq.ft. While being so, respondents 6 and 7 are being neighbours, cultivating agriculture crops in SF.No.256/2. They also started construction for poultry farms without obtaining necessary permission from the Government authorities i.e. Planning Permission, No Objection Certificate, Licence and Consent from the Government authorities for forming poultry farms. They failed to maintain hygienic atmosphere which is against Rules 32 and 34 of Tamil Nadu Panchayat Rules, 1997 and also against Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994. In fact, the fifth respondent issued statutory notice to the seventh respondent and thereby directed them to adhere Rules and Regulations by the proceedings dated 30.11.2022. However, the respondents 6 and 7 failed to obey the Rules and continued with construction. After completion of the entire construction, they started to operate poultry farm by handling the birds in SF.No.256/2 which is abutting the petitioner’s agricultural land. It was constructed without even maintaining the distance of 500 meters away from the residential area. They also caused nuisance due to odour and flies. They also violated the Rule that poultry farm should not be located within 100 meters from major water course like rivers, lakes, canals and drinking water sources like wells, summer storage tanks. Therefore, the petitioner submitted representation to take appropriate action as against the sixth and seventh respondents.

B) SUBMISSIONS

3. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the Section 2(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 defines “building” includes a house, out-house, tent, stable, latrine, shed, hut, wall (other than a boundary wall not exceeding 2.5 metres in height) and any other such structure, whether of masonry, bricks, wood, mud, metal or any other materials whatsoever. It requires planning and building permission from the authority concerned. Section 257 of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 provides power, authority and responsibilities of Panchayats. Accordingly, for constructions coming under Schedule-IV of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, the Government delegated power to the fifth respondent and responsibilities with respect to the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice and also with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them. However, the fifth respondent failed to take appropriate action as against the petitioner for illegal construction of poultry farm and to run the poultry farm without any licence.

3.1 He further submitted that as per Rule 33 of the Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019, the Zoning Regulations shall comprise of Residential use zone, Commercial use zone, Industrial use zone, Special and Hazardous use zone, Institutional use zone, Open Space and Recreational use zone, Urbanisable use zone and Ag

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top