Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED, J
Balasubramanian, S/o.S.Ravi – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.4288 of 2021 has been filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to appoint the Petitioner as a Dialysis Technician Grade-II in one of the posts identified by the 1st Respondent in G.O.(D)No.817 dated 14.09.2020.
2. The Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.13880 of 2021 has been filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus, challenging the impugned notification in Notification No: 01/MRB/2021 dated 06.02.2021 on the file of the 2nd Respondent and further direct the Respondents to proceed with the process of recruitment for the post of Dialysis Technician Grade-II by conducting a special test.
3. The facts of case, in a nutshell, led to filing of this Writ Petition and necessary for disposal of same, are as follows:-
(a)The Petitioner completed Higher Secondary Examination in the year 2009 and subsequently, the Petitioner completed a one-year certificate course in Dialysis Technology at Madurai Medical College, which included a three-month internship training at Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai. Thereafter, the Petitioner joined as
The court upheld the validity of the selection process for Dialysis Technician posts, emphasizing that temporary employment does not confer a right to regular appointment.
Petitioner's claims regarding recruitment procedures are dismissed as alternative remedies exist under the Administrative Tribunals Act.
Eligibility criteria for public service positions cannot solely depend on the timing of professional qualifications when educational qualifications are met prior to the notification date, violating p....
The State has the authority to determine qualifications and selection processes for recruitment, and a common examination for Diploma and Degree Holders does not violate Article 14 of the Constitutio....
The amendment allowing recruitment by transfer for Lab Technician positions did not infringe on the rights of DMLT candidates, balancing experience and new qualifications.
The court affirmed that petitioners, having previously accepted the selection process, were barred from later contesting the methodology due to principles of waiver and acquiescence, despite alleging....
Selection process legality cannot be challenged after participation without evidence of misconduct or unfairness.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
