IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
Naveed Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
ORDER :
C.V. Karthikeyan, J.
1. The Writ Petitioners had applied for the post of Assistant Surgeon (General).
2. All these Writ Petitions have been filed seeking records relating to the selection list issued consequent to Notification No.01/MRB/2024, dated 15.03.2024 with specific reference to Clause 6B(III) modified by Notification dated 14.05.2024 and selection list in Ref. No. PSL.No.01/MRB/2024 dated 20.02.2025 and to quash the same so far as the non-inclusion of these writ petitioners are concerned.
3. All the writ petitioners have raised the same ground questioning the Notification and therefore, a common order is passed with respect to these writ petitions.
4. All the writ petitioners were duly qualified to apply for the post of Assistant Surgeon (General). They had completed their Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (M.B.B.S.) Degree. Thereafter, they were issued with Provisional Certificate. Thereafter, they also completed their one year internship programme. On completion of internship, they were issued with Provisional Certificate-II. After receiving that particular certificate, they had applied with the third respondent for registration as registered Medical Practit
Rakesh Kumar Sharma Vs. State (NLT of Delhi) and Others
Dr. M.V. Nair v. Union of India & Ors.
Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan
A.P. Public Service Commission v. B. Sarat Chandra
Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Chander Shekhar
Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Chander Shekhar
Bhupinderpal Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Gujarat v. Arvindkumar T. Tiwari
Pramod Kumar v. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission
Eligibility for public employment must be evaluated against the qualifications held by candidates on the last application submission date, as clarified by established legal precedents.
Eligibility for recruitment must be determined by the last date for applications, and late qualifications do not grant a right to selection or appointment.
Eligibility for recruitment is determined as of the cut-off date specified in the notification; late registrations cannot be accepted as the process must ensure uniformity and fairness.
Eligibility for public employment must be assessed as of the recruitment notification's cut-off date; late qualifications, regardless of circumstances, do not confer rights for selection.
Eligibility for public employment is determined strictly as of the cut-off date specified in recruitment notifications, and late fulfillments do not confer a right to be considered.
Eligibility for public employment must be determined by qualifications as of the specified application deadline, with no exceptions for late registration.
Eligibility for public employment must be determined as of the last date for application submission. Late registration does not confer a right to be considered for selection.
The eligibility for selection in recruitment processes must be determined as of the last date for application, and extensions cannot be granted based on sympathy.
The eligibility of candidates for selection must be assessed as of the specified cut-off date, and compliance with notification requirements is mandatory.
Employment and Service matter - Recruitment Process on basis of advertisement - Qualification - It is well settled that suitability and eligibility have to be considered with reference to last date f....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.