Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Mad) 2436
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND K.RAJASEKAR
Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar State Human Rights Commission – Respondent
WP No. 2088 of 2025 AND WMP NO. 2455 OF 2025
Decided on : 22-04-2025
Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.U.Yuvaraj
For the Respondent: Mr.E.Renganayaki Agp Mr. A. Gokulakrishnan M/s. Sudha Ramalingam
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.U.Yuvaraj
For the Respondent: Mr.E.Renganayaki Agp Mr. A. Gokulakrishnan M/s. Sudha Ramalingam
A petitioner may withdraw a Writ Petition, resulting in its dismissal without costs if endorsed by the petitioner's counsel.
Headnote:(A) Writ Proceedings - Dismissal - Petitioner withdrew the Writ Petition, leading to dismissal without costs as per the endorsement by the petitioner's counsel. (Para 1)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to withdraw the Writ Petition before the High Court.
Findings of Court:
The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no costs imposed.
Issues: The main issue addressed was the withdrawal of the Writ Petition by the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court acknowledged the endorsement for withdrawal from the petitioner's counsel, leading to a dismissal of the case.
Result: Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's withdrawal of the writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn. (Para 2) |
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
