SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2436

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.RAJASEKAR, S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Registrar State Human Rights Commission – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.U.Yuvaraj
For the Respondent: Mr.E.Renganayaki Agp Mr. A. Gokulakrishnan M/s. Sudha Ramalingam

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top