SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1744

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
R. K. Sasidhar – Appellant
Versus
Controller of Examinations – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant : Mr.M.Vignesh Raj for Mr.M.Muthappan.
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Bharanidharan, Standing Counsel for TNPSC, Mr.S.John J.Raja Singh, Additional Government Pleader.

JUDGMENT :

[JUDGMENT OF THE COURT WAS DELIVERED BY S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

The learned counsel for the appellant seeks the permission of this Court that he wants to withdraw the present Writ Appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant also made an endorsement to the said effect in the bundle. Accordingly, this Court granted permission to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant to withdraw the present Writ Appeal.

2. In view of the submissions and also the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, the present Writ Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top