Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
J.Rajathilagam – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
ORDER :
The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Certiorarified Mandamus seeking records relating to an order of the 2nd respondent dated 24.07.2023 and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to grant minimum time scale of pay of Rs.18,500/- per month to the petitioners as had been extended in G.O.Ms.No.233, Public Works Department dated 06.12.2019.
2. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition it had been contended that the petitioner had been appointed as Nominal Muster Roll (NMR) casual labourer on 01.03.1998 and continue to discharge work under the respondents. It had been stated that though she had put to continuous uninterrupted work, her services had neither been regularized nor her salary had been brought under the regular minimum time scale of pay.
3. In this connection, it had further been contended that the respondents had passed G.O.Ms.233 Public Works Department date 06.12.2019 wherein, a Screening Committee had been formed to identify the similarly placed workmen like the petitioner and 3407 daily rated casual labourers had been pointed out and granted minimum time scale of pay.
4. Unfortunately, the case of the petitioner had not been exam
Temporary employees performing essential functions are entitled to regularization and minimum pay, emphasizing the responsibility of employers to ensure fair treatment and compliance with legal stand....
Recognition of entitlements for long-serving casual workers under employment laws, emphasizing fair treatment and prevention of exploitation by the State.
The court ruled that the failure to include petitioners in the Screening Committee due to administrative delay violated their rights to equal pay under Article 39(d) of the Constitution.
The court affirmed that denying equal pay to similarly situated casual labourers violates constitutional rights, emphasizing the need for timely administrative action.
Government departments must ensure fair employment practices and cannot exploit temporary workers, especially those with long service, by misapplying legal precedents.
The court emphasized the need for fair employment practices and the right to regularization for long-serving temporary employees, as per Supreme Court guidelines.
Equal pay for equal work under Article 39(d) of the Constitution mandates that similarly situated employees must receive the same remuneration, and arbitrary denial violates principles of natural jus....
Prolonged temporary employment without regularization contravenes labor rights; employers must ensure fair and stable employment as mandated by judicial principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
