Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
State, through The Inspector of Police – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Aziz – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial context of defendant's case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appeal against acquittal in fraud case. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding prosecutorial evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. judicial considerations on the absence of accusers. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's examination of evidence and proceedings. (Para 11 , 21) |
| 6. discussion of the conspiracy and fraud. (Para 14 , 16) |
| 7. establishment of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 22) |
| 8. summary of judicial reasoning and final judgment. (Para 23) |
| 9. final ruling and sentencing. (Para 30) |
JUDGMENT :
(K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.)
The CBI has filed this appeal, challenging the acquittal judgment passed in favour of the respondent herein who had been arrayed as accused No.5 in the parent case namely C.C.No.5 of 1998 on the file of the II Additional District Court for CBI Cases, Madurai. Since he had been absconding during the pendency of the trial in the parent case C.C.No.5 of 1998 the case was split up and new C.C.No.9 of 2010 was assigned and trial was conducted after securing him and the learned trial judge acquitted him from all the charges framed against him by the impugned judgment dated 29.01.2019. Aggrieved over the same, the CBI has filed this a
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
