IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. SURESH KUMAR, A.D. MARIA CLETE, JJ.
M.S. Kalaivani - Appellant
Versus
The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and Anr. – Respondents
W.A.No.102 of 2023
Decided On : 26-03-2025
(A) Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 - Sections 3(u) and 27(f) - Intra Court appeal against dismissal of writ petition seeking publication of Reserve List for Combined Civil Services Examination-II - The appellant ranked 1572nd contended that non-publication of Reserve List violated statutory provisions - The TNPSC's decision to dispense with the Reserve List was found to contravene the Act's mandate. (Paras 4, 6, 20, 34)
(B) Legal Mandate - The court emphasized that the Reserve List must contain not less than 25% of candidates from each reservation group and remain in force until the next recruitment - The TNPSC's rationale for dispensing with the Reserve List was rejected as unsustainable. (Paras 20, 34)
(C) Court's Findings - The court ruled that the TNPSC's Office Order No.134 dated 12.11.2020 was unenforceable due to the mandatory provisions of the 2016 Act, requiring the publication of a Reserve List. (Paras 34, 36)
(D) Result - The impugned order was set aside, directing TNPSC to publish a Reserve List within four weeks. (Paras 36)
JUDGMENT :
(R. SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This intra Court appeal has been directed against the order dated 28.10.2022 made in W.P.No.15390 of 2019.
2. That the first respondent / Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in short 'TNPSC' issued a notification for appointment to the post of Combined Civil Services Examination-II (Interview Posts) (Group-II Services) for the years 2014-15 and 2015-16 vide Notification No.7/2015 dated 30.04.2015.
3. The appellant was one of the candidates, who applied for the said selection process, where, after completion of the selection process, she has been ranked at Serial No.1572, she belongs to BC Community.
4. It is the case of the appellant / petitioner that though she secured the ranking of Serial No.1572 and the last person who was selected was in Serial No.1546, in BC category, she stood next to the last person who was selected and had there been a Reserve List, the appellant / petitioner would have been placed in the Reserve List as No.1 candidate, therefore whoever not joined from among the selected candidates or those who joined immediately left, by thus, if any vacancy is caused under BC quota, certainly the appellant / petitioner would have been in a position to be called for selection and she would have been selected and appointed. Therefore, the non-selection of the appellant / petitioner is due to the dispensing with the system of having the Reserve List of TNPSC, therefore the said dispensing of the Reserve List as has been done by TNPSC in the said recruitment is against the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 in short '2016 Act' and therefore, seeking a writ of mandamus, the appellant / petitioner had approached the writ Court to publish the Reserve List for the Regular Selection List pertaining to the Combined Civil Services Examination-I (Group-II) (Interview Posts) for the years 2014-15 and 2015-16 as notified in Notification No.7/2015 dated 30.04.2015 and consequently to fill up the unfilled vacancies caused due to non-joining / leaving of selected candidates with the candidates in the Reserve List to be published by TNPSC in the order of seniority and as per roaster within a reasonable time.
5. The said writ petition having been considered was dismissed by the writ Court through the order impugned dated 28.10.2022.
6. Assailing the impugned order passed by the writ Court, Mr.L.Chandrakumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would contend that, under Section 3(u) of 2016 Act, the Reserve List has been defined, which reads thus:
"3(u) "reserve list" means a list which is prepared so as to contain not less than 25% of the candidates of each reservation group including General Turn in the regular list and shall be in force until the regular list is drawn up subsequently."
7. Therefore, the publication of the Reserve List contains not less than 25% of the candidates of each reservation group including general turn and to keep the same till the next recruitment is published. It is must and is a mandate under 2016 Act, therefore such a mandate cannot be given a go-by by TNPSC as they have unilaterally seems to have taken a decision not to publish the Reserve List in the said recruitment, therefore, the appellant / petitioner is entitled to seek for such mandamus and the same since has not been considered in proper perspective by the writ Court by rejecting the writ petition through the impugned order which warrants interference at the hands of the Division Bench, he contended.
8. However, Mrs.G.Hema, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission would submit that, it is a Combined Civil Services Examination-II (Interview Posts) (Group-II Services). As several posts have been included in the same examination and selection process, the TNPSC thought it fit to introduce the counselling system. Since the counselling system has been introduced, the preparation and publication of the Reserve List may be a difficult
The court held that the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission must publish a Reserve List as mandated by the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016, ensuring compliance with ....
The court established that the provisions regarding the maintenance of a reserve list in the Tamil Nadu Government Servants Act are mandatory, contrary to the learned single Judge's ruling.
A recruitment body is not mandated to maintain a waiting list unless explicitly stated in recruitment rules; candidates cannot claim such a right post-participation.
Candidates cannot claim a right for a reserve list unless it is mandated by specific rules or advertisement.
Point of law: Recruitment - duty of the Public Service Commission is to make available to the Government a complete list of qualified candidates arranged in order of merit. Thereafter the Government ....
The court emphasized the obligation to maintain a Reserve Panel for timely appointments, asserting candidates have a legitimate expectation to be considered for unfilled vacancies, as mandated by ear....
Sub-clause (vi) of Rule 277A of Rules of 1996 read as Authorized Agency shall prepare category wise select list of candidates declared successful on basis of criteria of selection laid down.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.