Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Mr Justice P.B. Balaji, J
N.Ramamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Virudhunagar District – Respondent
ORDER :
P.B. Balaji, J.
Heard Mr.V.R.Venkatesan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the subject lands are Natham lands and even as early as in the year 1955, there was a registered partition deed in document No.834 of 1955, on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Ramanathapuram. The petitioner's father's brother namely Parthasarathy became entitled to portion of the property, which was the subject matter of the said partition deed. The said Parthasarathy during his lifetime being in possession and enjoyment of the lands allotted to him and the said partitioned portion was using it as a cattle shed and he has executed a Will on 25.06.1997 in favour of his daughter Lakshmi Prabha. After the lifetime of the said Parathasarathy, his daughter Lakshmi Prabha was in enjoyment of the subject lands, which were bequeathed to her father. Thereafter, the said Lakshmi Prabha in and by the settlement deed dated 23.07.2015 in document No. 2301/2015, on the file the Sub-Registrar, Kariyapatti, Virudhunagar District, has settled the property in favour of her elde
The classification of 'Grama Natham' lands does not vest with the Government, and procedural fairness must be observed in land entitlement claims.
Ownership of Natham land cannot be claimed by mere occupation; regulatory authority rests with the Government to issue land assignments judiciously and effectively.
Occupation of natham land does not confer ownership; claims based on forged documents are invalid under government regulations.
Mere occupation of Natham land does not confer ownership; legal title must stem from lawful government grant. Forged documents undermine claims.
Grama Natham lands assigned under the Natham scheme remain with the occupant despite allegations of commercial use unless large-scale exploitation is established.
Natham Poramboke lands are designated for residential use only and cannot be exploited for commercial purposes; unauthorized occupants are considered encroachers and may be evicted under governing la....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that Gramanatham lands are private interest lands and do not vest with the Government, and the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, ....
Entitlement to patta on ancestral property requires proper classification and review by competent authority, guided by due procedural compliance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
