SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3341

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Suresh Kumar, A.D.Maria Clete, JJ.
Rajkumar, S/o. Sathasivam - Appellant
Versus
P. Subhashini, D/o. Palaniyappan - Respondent
CMA NO. 961 of 2024
Decided On : 24-02-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S. Senthil
For the Respondent: K. Dhananjayan

Compromise agreements in divorce cases are valid and can lead to consent divorce if both parties agree voluntarily and without coercion.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1944 - Section 13(1), (i-a), (i-b); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13B - Appeal against dismissal of divorce petition - Parties entered into a compromise during appeal; respondent consents to divorce and acknowledges receipt of Rs.10,00,000/- for lifetime maintenance. (Paras 2, 3, 4, 8)

(B) Compromise in divorce proceedings - Valid when both parties voluntarily agree without coercion; consent divorce can be sought based on compromise before appropriate court. (Paras 7, 8)

(C) Proceeding after compromise - Directions provided for formal filing under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with waiver of statutory period for divorce. (Paras 8, 9)

Table of Content
1. civil miscellaneous appeal for divorce seeking resolution. (Para 1 , 2)
2. compromise reached between parties during appeal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court acknowledges need for formal petition post-compromise. (Para 6 , 7)
4. directions for consent divorce petition under section 13b. (Para 8)
5. impugned order set aside; appeal disposed. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT :

R.Suresh Kumar J.

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Family Court at Namakkal dated 27.02.2024 made in F.C.O.P.No.335 of 2022.

2. By the said F.C.O.P., the appellant / husband had filed a petition before the Family Court under Section 13(1), (i-a) (i-b) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1944 seeking for divorce. That petition was dismissed by the order impugned, against which this appeal has been made.

3. Today, when the case is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant / husband as well as the learned counsel for the respondent / wife stated that, during the pendency of this appeal, there has been a compromise entered into between the parties ie., the appellant / husband and the respondent / wife. The compromise had been reduced into writing and a joint compromise memo to that effect dated 14.02.2025 is also filed before this Court, which reads thus:

MEMORANDUM OF JOINT COMPROMISE FILED UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 3 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

The Appellant had filed a petition seeking for Divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion in F.C.O.P.No.335 of 2022 before the Family Court, Namakkal, which was dismissed on 27.02.2024, against the same, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred.

During the pendency of the above Appeal, the parties have decided to enter into the compromise to put a quietus to the issue on the following terms:

1. The respondent has no objection in allowing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by the Appellant (Husband) by granting a decree of divorce of the marriage dated 26.06.2020 solemnized between the appellant and the respondent at Kakaveri Arulmighu Shri Thiripurasundari Thirukovil.

2. The Appellant has paid a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to the respondent by way of Demand Draft in D.D.No.921853 dated 26.11.2024, towards full and final one time settlement towards lifetime maintenance and the respondent hereby acknowledges the receipt of the same.

3. The appellant and the respondent declares that there is no claim against each other in respect of movable or immovable properties, including maintenance.

4. The appellant and the respondent had decided to file this compromise memo out of their free will and there is no coercion between the parties.

5. Therefore, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to accept the compromise memo filed by both parties and allow the appeal without cost and thus render justice.

Dated at Chennai on this the 14th day of February 2025.

Sd/-Sd/-
AppellantRespondent
Counsel for AppellantCounsel for Appellant

4. Relying upon the above joint compromise memo under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC, learned counsel for both sides would submit that since the respondent / wife has agreed for giving consent divorce and permanent maintenance for the whole life time has also been fixed at Rs.10,00,000/- which has already been paid by way of a Demand Draft dated 26.11.2024 and receipt of the same has been acknowledged by the respondent / wife in the joint compromise memo, recording the same this Court can show its indulgence by setting aside the judgment which is impugned herein and grant a decree of divorce between the appellant and the respondent.

5. In fact the appellant / husband is physically present before this Court and the respondent / wife is present before this Court through video conference. They also expressed their consent to record the compromise memo dated 14.02.2025.

6. We have considered the said submission made by the learned counsel for both sides and also have taken note of the contents of the joint memo of compromise.

7. Sin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top