SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3596

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
K. Radhakrishnan - Appellant
Versus
Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd. - Respondent
W.P. No. 13052 of 2020
Decided On : 12-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : G.K. Dharshini, Krishnaswamy R.
For the Respondent: C. Gowthamaraj

The management cannot recover the monetary value of unimplemented punishments post-retirement as there is no provision in the Certified Standing Orders allowing such actions.

Headnote:(A) Writ of Declaration - Recovery of monetary value of unimplemented punishment - The petitioner challenged the recovery of Rs.25,200/- as illegal and without jurisdiction, seeking refund and settlement of terminal benefits - The court found no provision in Certified Standing Orders for such recovery post-retirement. (Paras 1, 10)

(B) Jurisdiction - The management's action to recover unimplemented punishment was held to be without jurisdiction, as no provision existed in the Certified Standing Orders allowing such recovery. (Paras 7, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a retired conductor, was penalized with a stoppage of increment, which was not implemented before retirement, leading to a recovery demand.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the recovery was without jurisdiction and directed the respondents to refund the amount and settle terminal benefits with interest.

Issues: The main issues were the legality of the recovery of unimplemented punishment and the jurisdiction of the management to enforce such recovery post-retirement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the management could not enforce recovery of unimplemented punishments after retirement, as no relevant provisions existed in the Certified Standing Orders.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. recovery is illegal (Para 3)
2. refund and settle benefits (Para 8 , 9)

ORDER :

1. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring that the action of the respondents in recovering a sum of Rs.25,200/- from the petitioner towards the monetary value of the unimplemented punishment as illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to refund him a sum of Rs.25,200/- and to settle all his terminal benefits such as Gratuity, PF, the amounts payable under Social Security Scheme and Family Benefit Fund Scheme, Earned Leave Salary, IRT contributions and commuted value of pension, together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum, within a specified time.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he joined as conductor in the first respondent Corporation on 21.04.1988 and subsequently he was designated as Special Grade Conductor. While the petitioner was working in such post, a charge memo was issued against the petitioner on 30.04.2019 stating that the petitioner has already sold ticket to the value of Rs.11/- to one passenger and framed two charges pertaining to the year 2019. The petitioner has given his explanation dated 21.05.2019 and requested to exonerate him from the charges. However, the second respondent issued a final order dated 31.08.2019 and imposed the punishment against the petitioner to reduce in pay by 3 stages with cumulative effect for the period of one year. Challenging the same, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the first respondent to set aside the order dated 31.08.2019. The first respondent has passed an order dated 13.11.2019 and modified the punishment into stoppage of increment for 6 months with cumulative effect. After completion of more than 31 years of service, the petitioner retired on 31.01.2020 on attaining the age of superannuation. Since, the modified punishment could not be implemented, the respondents 1 and 2 forced the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.25,200/- towards the monetary value of the unimplemented punishment of stoppage of increment for six months with cumulative effect. Thereafter, the petitioner sent a representation dated 11.08.2020 to the respondents and requested to refund the amount of Rs.25,200/- which was recovered from him and also to settle all his terminal benefits. But the respondents have not settled the same. Therefore, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that the writ petition has been filed challenging the recovery for a sum of Rs.25,200/- from the petitioner towards monetary value of unimplemented punishment is illegal and without jurisdiction.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that the issue has already been dealt with the following Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court :-

(i) The State Express Transport Corporation (Tamil Nadu) Limited Rep. by its Managing Director and Others vs. G. Senthil and another, dated in W.A. (MD) No. 1270 of 2020 dated 15.06.2021

(ii) The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd. and another vs. K. Perumal in W.A. (MD) No. 417 of 2024 dated 18.03.2024

5. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the Judgment of the writ appeals cited by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case.

6. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and also perused the materials available on record.

7. It is seen that the issue is squarely covered by following decisions of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court:-

(i) In The State Express Transport Corporation (Tamil Nadu) Limited Rep. by its Managing Director and Others vs. G. Senthil and another, dated 15.06.2021, it has been held as under :-

7. The above condition states that the increment postponement orders which could not be implemented p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top