IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. NISHA BANU, R. SAKTHIVEL, JJ.
M/s. Colorhome Developers Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
M/s. Kanchipattinam Villa Owners Association Karai - Respondent
C.M.S.A. No. 66 of 2024
Decided On : 10-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. developer's duties and project registration requirements. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. substantial questions of law regarding project classification. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. obligations of the builder and offered amenities evaluation. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. findings on ongoing project status and registration necessity. (Para 10 , 18) |
| 5. court affirms necessity of compliance with regulatory directions. (Para 12) |
| 6. relevant provisions under real estate act for dispute resolution. (Para 19) |
| 7. court's dismissal and direction for compliance. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
J. NISHA BANU, J.
1. This appeal is filed by Developer/builder praying to set aside the order dated 17.11.2023 passed in Appeal No.60 of 2023 on the file of Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (TNREAT), whereby, the Appellate Tribunal confirmed the order passed by the Regulatory Authority in C.No.66 of 2022, dated 02.03.2023 on the file of Tamil nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA).
2. The developer/builder raise the following substantial questions of law for consideration of this CMSA.
(i) When the project is developed only as a residential layout project as per the approval granted by the competent authorities and exempted from registration under Rule 2(h) (iii) whether the authority under the Act is empowered to direct registration of the project under Section 3 of the Act as a gated community project.
(ii) Whether the promoter could be made liable to register the entire project as a gated community, when the purchasers of the plots have constructed their Villas by third party builder.
(iii) Whether the promoter could be held liable under the provisions of Section 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the RERA Act, when the promoter has not constructed the Villas in the project.
3.....
(a) In this case, the complainant is M/s.Kanchipattinam Villa Owners" Association KARAI. They submitted a complaint before the TNRERA against the developer/builder viz., M/s.Colorhome Developers Pvt Ltd in respect of the residential layout called Kanchipattinam situated at Vedal Village, Karai, Kanchipuram, stating that they are builder of the Villas in the layout.
(b) It is stated that the respondent-developer advertised the project as Gated Community in media stating that the residential project is formed in 120 Acres of land with all world class 50 plus amenities. Among other amenities, 16 amenities which were promised to be provided to the gated community project within one year from the date of signing of the construction agreement, the respondent failed to provide any amenities to the buyers till date of the complaint. The said 16 amenities are as follows:-
(i) Ultra Modern Club House which includes (a) Swimming Pool (b) A/C Gym © Indoor Games (d) Badminton Court
(ii) Community Hall
(iii) Play School
(iv) Super Market
(v) Parks (with Yoga Hut & Senior Citizen Area)
(vi) Volleyball Court
(vii) Basketball Court
(viii) Cricket Pitch
(ix) Jogging Track
(x) Common Lighting
(xi) Underground Drainage/Sewerage Treatment Plan (STP)/Water
(xii) Underground water storming
(xiii) Underground Electricity Cables along with Phase E.B.Supply will be provided. Power backup vide Diesel Generator shall be provided for Community Hall and Club House.
(xiv) Drinking water pipelines.
(xv) Outer Compound wall with appropriate gates, utmose safety and hi-tech security (24x7) shall be provided for the project. However the part of the second part is prohibited to fence the schedule mentioned plot as the party of the first part shall demark the measurements and boundaries during the execution of the sale deed.
(xvi) Street lights with possible solar power/necessary power backups at the discretion of the party of first part shall be provided.
(c) The complaint also states that the project has not been completed till date; many construction activities are pending including club house and other amenities mentioned above. But the respondent had failed to register the project with TNRERA and has not obtained any exemption and hence the respondent is co
Developers must register ongoing projects under RERA when promised amenities are not completed, establishing accountability and compliance within real estate regulation.
The court affirmed that ongoing real estate projects must be registered under RERA to protect allottee interests, regardless of title transfer.
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act mandates registration for ongoing projects, where completion certificates are absent, emphasizing consumer protection in real estate transactions.
Complaints under RERA can only be filed for projects capable of registration; lack of necessary permissions renders a project unregistrable, barring complaints.
RERA applies to ongoing projects regardless of completion status, ensuring consumer protection and allowing for grievances to be raised under its provisions.
The RERA Act applies to ongoing projects regardless of completion dates, ensuring consumer grievances are addressed under its provisions.
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act empowers TNRERA to investigate ongoing projects and financial dealings, safeguarding buyers' interests.
The definition of 'promoter' under RERA allows for developers without land ownership to register projects, and failure by UPRERA to act within statutory timeframes results in deemed registration.
The completion certificate issued must be strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan and specifications, and the responsibilities of the promoter include providing and maintaining essential serv....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.