Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.NISHA BANU, R.KALAIMATHI
KSM Nirman Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Olympia Grande Apartments Owner's Welfare Association – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case and facts leading to appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments by the appellant regarding applicability of rera. (Para 3) |
| 3. counterarguments by respondent and interpretations of rera. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's analysis of legislative intent behind rera. (Para 5) |
| 5. court's observations on maintainability and directives to regulatory authority. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 6. conclusion dismissing the appeal. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
J. NISHA BANU, J.
1. Challenging the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (TNREAT) in Appeal No.75 of 2019, dated 09.11.2020, the aggrieved respondent therein/Developer, has preferred the present Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal. The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, set aside the order in C.No.327/2019 dated 6.11.2019 and directed the Regulatory Authority to dispose the complaint on merits.
2. The necessary facts leading to the filing of this appeal would run thus:
2.1.The appellant herein, M/s.KSM Nirman Private Limited, presently known as M/s.Olympia Tech Park (Chennai) Private Limited, commenced the project in the year 2012 (16 residential towers with 744 apartments and 1 commercial tower). On 26.04.2012, the appellant
RERA applies to ongoing projects regardless of completion status, ensuring consumer protection and allowing for grievances to be raised under its provisions.
The RERA Act applies to ongoing projects regardless of completion dates, ensuring consumer grievances are addressed under its provisions.
The completion certificate issued must be strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan and specifications, and the responsibilities of the promoter include providing and maintaining essential serv....
The court established that a project with delays in completion falls under RERA's provisions, and mere local authority certifications do not suffice as valid completion certificates.
The existence and date of issuance of occupancy certificates are critical in determining whether a real estate project is ongoing under the RERA.
The court clarified that the Completion Certificate's issuance date is crucial in determining a project's ongoing status under RERA, emphasizing the conjunctive reading of statutory provisions.
A project with a completion certificate issued prior to RERA's enactment is not considered ongoing under the RERA Act, thus not subject to its jurisdiction.
A project completed before the commencement of the Real Estate Act is not subject to the Act's registration requirements, regardless of later safety certificate issues.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the definition of 'ongoing project' under Rule 2(h) of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate (Regulation and Deve....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
