SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4095

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
M.Jayaraj - Appellant 
Versus 
The Chief Educational Officer, Vellore District - Respondent 
W.P.No.18934 of 2020
Decided on : 27-01-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.M.Ravi
For the Respondents:Mr.T.M.Rajangam, Government Advocate

The court established that seniority must be respected in pay fixation, and government orders mandating pay rectification should be implemented without regard to union differences.

Headnote:(A) Government Orders - G.O.Ms.No.19 and G.O.Ms.No.20, School Education Department dated 07.02.2019 - Pay fixation - The petitioner challenged the order denying equal pay with his junior, asserting seniority and applicability of government orders for pay refixation. (Paras 1, 3, 6, 10)

(B) Legal principles - The court emphasized that government orders must be implemented to rectify pay anomalies, and seniority should be respected in pay fixation regardless of union differences. (Paras 5, 7, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, promoted through various roles in the education department since 1988, sought equal pay with his junior, who received higher pay, citing seniority and relevant government orders. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court ordered the respondents to refix the petitioner's pay equal to his junior, granting all consequential monetary benefits within six weeks. (Paras 18)

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner, despite being in different unions, was entitled to equal pay based on seniority and applicable government orders.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the reasoning for denying equal pay based on union differences was unsustainable, emphasizing that government orders mandate rectification of pay anomalies. (Paras 10, 18)

Result: Writ petition allowed.

ORDER :

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.9855/C5/2020 dated 20.03.2020 and further directing the respondents herein to refix the pay of the petitioner in the higher post of BT Middle School Headmaster equal to the pay of his junior in the said post with effect from the date of drawal of higher pay by his junior in the said post and accordingly refix the pay of the petitioner in the post of Block Educational Officer after implementation of G.O.Ms.No.19, School Education Department, dated 07.02.2019 and G.O.Ms.No.20, School Education Department dated 07.02.2019 with effect from 07.02.2019 and grant all consequential monetary benefits with payment of arrears to the petitioner.

2. The Petitioner was initially appointed as Secondary Grade Assistant on 25.10.1988 and attained Selection Grade Scale of pay in the said post from 25.10.1998. Thereafter he acquired B.A. B.Ed qualification on 26.11.1999 and MA qualification by 25.10.2002. His pay was fixed as the pay of Primary School Headmaster on 01.10.2005 and was given Selection Grade Scale of Pay in the post of Primary School Headmaster with effect from 27.10.2008. Thereafter, he was promoted to the post of BT Assistant on 01.10.2009 and further promoted as Middle School Headmaster 02.06.2010. He was later deputed to the post of Block Educational Officer on 12.06.2018 and has been rendering service in the Education Department for more than 32 years.

3. The petitioner submitted a detailed representation dated 27.12.2019 to the first respondent for grant of equal pay on par with his junior Tmt.Dhanalakshmi and the same was rejected by the District Chief Educational Officer of Unified Vellore District in and by proceedings in Na.Ka.No.9855/C5/2020 dated 20.03.2020, on the ground that while the Petitioner was initially appointed as Secondary Grade Assistant in Pernambet Union and presently serving as Block Education Officer, Nemili Union, whereas Tmt.Dhanalakshmi was appointed as Secondary Grade Assistant at K.V.Kuppam Union and there is no provision in the Rules for a senior to claim equal pay on par with his junior if they belong to different unions as each Union is a separate unit in the Elementary Education Department. Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that he was transferred to Gudiyatham Union from Pernambet Union in the year 1990 and his junior, Tmt.T.Dhanalakshmi came on transfer to Gudiyatham Union from K.V.Kuppam Union during the year 1991. Hence, it is not the case that he has been transferred to the union in which his junior Tmt.Dhanalakshmi was serving, and on the other hand, it was his junior Tmt. Dhanalakshmi who was transferred from a different Union to Gudiyatham Union, in which the Petitioner was already serving as Secondary Grade Assistant from the year 1990-1994.

5. It is submitted that in terms of the date of the initial appointment as Secondary Grade Assistant as well as the date of transfer to Gudiyatham Union, the Petitioner is senior to Tmt.Dhanalakshmi. More importantly, both Tmt.Dhanalakshmi and the Petitioner have been serving in the same Union from the year 1991 till the date on which the anomaly of junior drawing more pay than senior arose, i.e., on 01.10.2013. Even after the pay anomaly arose, both of them were serving in the same Union wherein she was drawing higher pay than the Petitioner till the date of promotion to the post of Block Educational Officer i.e., on 12.06.2018. Hence the reasoning assigned by the First Respondent that they were serving in different union and hence there is no provision for claiming equal pay on par with his junior is unsustainable in law and on facts.

6. It is further submitted that, though the Government has declared that the post of Block Educational Officer is a promotion to the post of Middle School H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top