SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4483

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, A.D. MARIA CLETE, JJ.
S. Tharakeswari - Petitioner 
Versus
The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Virudhunagar and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD) No.24949 of 2022
Decided On : 24-06-2025 


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A. Haja Mohideen.
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader, Mr. N. Dilip Kumar, Mr. Saravanan for Mr. A. Sivaji.

The public pathway, classified as Government Poramboke, must be maintained for public use, and the revenue authorities have the duty to act against private encroachments.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Right to property - The restoration and maintenance of the public pathway in Survey No.100, classified as Government Poramboke, is essential for public use - Encroachment by private party was challenged through a writ petition. (Paras 1, 3, 6)

(B) Civil Procedure Code - Decree of Civil Court - The decree is not binding on revenue authorities as they were not made parties. (Paras 2, 3)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought restoration of a public pathway encroached upon and locked by a private individual, which had been verified as Government Poramboke after a survey.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the revenue authorities to initiate eviction proceedings based on the survey report within two weeks and maintain the pathway for public use.

Issues: Whether the encroachment on the public pathway should be rectified, what authority the revenue authorities possess in this context, and the binding nature of a civil suit decree on revenue officers.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that the pathway is classified as Government Poramboke, indicating it is in the public domain, and reaffirmed that the revenue authorities must act to restore access for public use.

Result: Writ petition disposed of; direction issued for eviction proceedings.

Table of Content
1. writ petition seeking restoration of public pathway (Para 1 , 2)
2. findings from the tahsildar's survey on pathway classification (Para 3 , 4)
3. actions to be taken based on survey findings (Para 5)
4. eviction proceedings mandated by the court (Para 6 , 7)

Order :

[S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

The writ on hand has been instituted seeking a direction to the respondents to restore the pathway in Survey No.100, Ward No.17, North Street, Sevalpatti Street, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District, from the encroachment of the fourth respondent and maintain and protect the same for the public use without any hindrance by considering the petitioner's representation dated 13.10.2022 and for other such reliefs, within the period stipulated by this Court.

2. Admittedly, a civil suit has been instituted between the private parties. Pertinently, the revenue authorities were not made as party respondents in the civil suit. Therefore, the Civil Court's decree is not binding on the revenue authorities.

3. The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam, has filed a counter affidavit stating that he had inspected the disputed site on 09.11.2022 and submitted a report as follows:

“Ward F, Block No.3, T.S.No.11 measuring 0.0034.0 Squire Meter of Rajapalayam Town is classified as Government Poramboke General Pathway as per Supplementary Town Survey Record. During preliminary Town Survey, T.S.No.100 measuring 0.0034.0 Squire Meter is classified as Government Poramboke – Public Pathway – In the Adangal column the names of the following 3 individuals had been noted.

1.Sankarappa Naidu son of Krishnasamy Naidu

2. Muthiah Naidu son of Chinna Thambi Naidu

3. Krishnasamy Naidu son of Muthiah Naidu.

T.S.No.100, Re-survey No.267B/1 measuring 0.15.0 ares is classified as Grama Natham

Ward F, Block 3, T.S.No.100 was inspected along with Taluk Deputy Surveyor on 8.11.2022. On ground, T.S.100 south-north, on the eastern side 1.5 Meter has been locked by way of Iron Door, and maintained by respondent (4th respondent). At present, the petitioner is running from T.S.No.102 via T.S.No.100 to reach T.S.No. 98/1, 98/2 and 99/2. At present, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition to utilize the pathway in T.S.No.100 which was locked by the 4th respondent by Iron gate. During supplemental and Preliminary survey T.S.No.100 (locked by the 4th respondent by way of iron gate) is classified as Government Poramboke. “Copy of the report of Sub Inspector of Survey is placed in the Typed set.”

4. Further, the Tahsildar, in his counter in paragraph No.7, has stated as follows:

“7. ...The Sub Inspect of Survey, after inspection of the site has reported that during supplemental and Preliminary survey T.S.No.100 (locked by the 4th respondent by way of Iron gate) is classified as Government Poramboke. “Copy of the report of Sub-Inspector of Survey is placed in the Typed set.”

5. In view of the above categorical finding made by the Tahsildar, after conducting a survey all appropriate actions are to be taken by following the procedures as contemplated under the relevant act and rules.

6. Since a survey has already been conducted, the Commissioner / second respondent is directed to initiate eviction proceedings based on the survey report and by following the procedures as contemplated under the relevant act and rules. Such an exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top