Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.SUBRAMANIAN, C.KUMARAPPAN
Malliga (Died) – Appellant
Versus
S. Shanmugam (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. SUBRAMANIAN, J.
1. The second defendant in O.S.No.155 of 2013, a suit for partition, is on an appeal aggrieved by the rejection of her claim to a share in the suit properties by the Trial Court.
2. Parties will be referred to as per their rank in the suit for the purpose of convenience. The first respondent as plaintiff sued for partition and separate possession of his half share in the suit properties. Item 1 of the suit properties originally belonged to one Chinnu Gounder, who had, by a settlement deed dated 25.07.1946, settled the said properties among other properties in favour of his three sons namely Sevi Gounder, Chinnapaiya Gounder and Chinna Gounder, and two of his brother's sons namely Ayyamperumal Gounder and Periasamy Gounder. As per the said instrument, the settlees will take a life interest in the properties settled under the said document and after their death, the properties will devolve on their male issues. The document also provides that in the absence of male issues, the properties will devolve on the other heirs. Contending that Sevi Gounder died leaving behind the plaintiff himself and the first defendant as his heirs, the plaintiff sought for parti
The remarriage of a widow does not disqualify her from inheriting her deceased husband's property under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that properties derived by the father through a partition deed are to be treated as his self-acquired properties, as per Section 8 of the Hindu Suc....
The court ruled that an oral partition was established and the plaintiff cannot claim partial partition without including all relevant properties, adhering to heirs' rights under Hindu law.
The remarriage of a widow does not divest her of property inherited from her deceased husband under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as the Act provides for absolute ownership.
The amendment to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act grants daughters equal rights as coparceners, allowing them to claim shares in ancestral properties irrespective of their birth date.
Widow's remarriage does not strip her of inheritance rights, and married daughters have equal entitlement to family property under the amended Hindu Succession Act.
A son born from a void marriage has rights to inheritance under amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, affirming equal status to legitimate and illegitimate children in claims for partition post the....
The court affirmed that items 1 and 2 of suit properties are ancestral, and items 3 to 11 are self-acquired, highlighting the plaintiffs' burden to prove family property claims.
The Hindu Succession Act's provisions do not apply retrospectively to successions that occurred before its enactment, precluding daughters from inheriting property from fathers who died before 1956.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
