J. J. MUNIR
Phagoo – Appellant
Versus
Gokaran – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.J. Munir, J.
1. This is a defendant's second appeal arising out of a preliminary decree for partition.
2. Gokaran, the sole plaintiff of Original Suit No.20 of 1972, instituted a suit for partition of four houses, shown in the schedule, with their own boundaries at the foot of the plaint, giving rise to the suit and all located in Plot No.854/29. The plaintiff demanded partition of his 1/3rd share in the four houses aforesaid, hereinafter referred to as 'the suit property', that he claimed against the defendants on the basis of a registered sale deed dated 13.12.1971, executed in his favour by Smt. Jashoda widow of Patiraj. The suit property was originally owned by one Tirath Ram son of Patiraj, who had acquired it of his own exertions. Tirath Ram died on 14.10.1967. Smt. Jashoda was his mother. She executed a registered sale deed dated 13.12.1971 of her 1/3rd share in the plaintiff's favour. The plaintiff, besides seeking a decree of partition and separate possession, prayed that a decree for the recovery of a sum of Rs.2136/- be passed against defendant Nos.1 and 2, and another for Rs.840/- against defendant Nos.6 and 7, on account of his proportionate share in the rent
Dindayal v. Rajaram in AIR 1970 SC 1019
Gostha Behari Bera v. Haridas Samantra
G.T.M. Kotturuswami vs. S. Veerayya
Velamuri Venkata Sivaprasad (dead) by LRs v. Kothuri Venkateswarlu (dead) by LRs and others
Cherotte Sugathan v. Cherotte Bharathi
Kannikandath Kizhe Purakkal Velia's Son, Thayan v. Kannikandath Kozhe Purakkal
Asha Sharma and others v. Amar Nath and others
Sankar Prasad Khan and others v. Smt. Ushabala Dasi and other
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.