C.S. Senthilkumar vs R. Komalavalli - 2026 Supreme(Mad) 697

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Mad) 697

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI
C.S. Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
R. Komalavalli – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. M. Vijay Anand.
For the Respondents: Mr. V. Manohar.

Table of Content
1. appellants' arguments on property ownership and settlement deeds (Para 4)
2. respondents' arguments regarding ancestral property nature (Para 5)
3. court's analysis of arguments and findings (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. final conclusion and judgment outcome (Para 22)

JUDGMENT :

The defendants 2 to 5 in a suit for partition and separate possession are the appellants in this First Appeal.

2.1. PLAINT, IN BRIEF:

2.2. WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE FIRST DEFENDANT IN BRIEF:

2.3. WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE SECOND DEFENDANT AND ADOPTED BY THE FOURTH DEFENDANT, IN BRIEF:

2.4. WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS 3 AND 5, IN BRIEF:

2.5.REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE FIRST PLAINTIFF, IN BRIEF:

2.6. ISSUES FRAMED BY THE TRIAL COURT:

(2) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for declaration of the Settlement deed dated 08.09.2010 by 1^st defendant in favour of 5^th defendant as null and void and not binding upon him as prayed?

(4) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for future mesne profits as prayed for?

(6) To what other relief the plaintiff is entitled?

On the side of the plaintiffs, the first plaintiff and one Shanthakumari were examined as P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document