S. K. PANIGRAHI
Nitu Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha (Vigilance) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. K. Panigrahi, J. - These petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) have been filed with a prayer to quash the proceedings emanating from V.G.R. Case No. 5(c) of 2013 arising out of Balasore Vigilance P.S. Case No. 30 of 2013, for alleged commission of offences u/s 13(2), r/w Section 13(1)(c)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as PCA) and u/s 420, 468, 409, 379, 411 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) which is pending in the Court of learned Special Judge Vigilance, Keonjhar. As the petition involves the same facts, they are being decided by this common judgment and order.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the present matter are as follows:
i. Upon receiving a reference from the Department of Steel and Mines, Govt. of Odisha, State Vigilance officials conducted an enquiry and joint physical verification of the Uliburu Mines area from 01.07.2013 to 04.07.2013, subsequently a First Information Report (hereinafter referred to as FIR) was lodged on 27.07.2013 against the present petitioners and a host of officials of the Mining, Forest and Revenue Departments of
Indian Oil Corpn. v. NEPC India Ltd.
Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours (P) Ltd.
Anil Khadkiwala v. State (NCT of Delhi)
CBI v. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd. [(1996) 5 SCC 591 : 1996 SCC (Cri) 1045]
Chandi Kumar Das Karmarkar v. Abanidhar Roy
E.G. Barsay v. State of Bombay
GHCL Employees Stock Option Trust v. India Infoline Ltd.
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar [(2000) 4 SCC 168 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 786]
Iridium Indian Telecom Limited v. Motorola Inc.
Keki Hormusji Gharda v. Mehervan Rustom Irani
M. Krishnan v. Vijay Singh [(2001) 8 SCC 645 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 19]
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Datar Switchgear Ltd.
Maksud Saiyed v. State of Gujarat
Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. v. Biological E. Ltd. [(2000) 3 SCC 269 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 615]
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Judicial Magistrate
Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi [(1999) 3 SCC 259 : 1999 SCC (Cri) 401]
Rupan Deol Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill[(1995) 6 SCC 194 : 1995 SCC (Cri) 1059]
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla
S.W. Palanitkar v. State of Bihar
Sardar Singh v. State of Haryana
Shakson Belthissor v. State of Kerala
Sham Sunder v. State of Haryana
State of Bihar v. Rajendra Agrawalla[(1996) 8 SCC 164 : 1996 SCC (Cri) 628]
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal [1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426]
State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Mohd. Sharaful Haque [(2005) 1 SCC 122 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 283]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.