BISWANATH RATH
Batakrushna Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Consolidation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Biswanath Rath, J.
This writ petition involves a challenge to the quashing of orders under Annexures-1 and 2 and thereby affirming the order under Annexure-3.
2. Factual background involved in the case is that all the proceedings involved herein have been exercised by the competent authority under the provision of the Orissa Consolidation of Holdings & Prevention of Fragmentation of Land Act, 1972 (for short “The Act, 1972”). These proceedings have also a bearing in the W.P.(C).Nos.4603, 4604, 4605, 4606 and 4608 all are of 2016 involving similar set of objection cases from very beginning. Fact reveals, initially 5 objection cases i.e. Objection Case Nos.2512, 1511, 2395, 2475 and 2629 all of 1981 were filed under Section 9 (3) of the Act, 1972 as seen from Annexure-2 involving the writ petition. Except one objection case i.e. Objection Case No.2395 filed by one Kasinath was partly allowed, all others were rejected. As a consequence of disposal of all 5 objection cases with allowing one objection case, 5 appeals under Section 12 of the Act, 1972 were filed. All the 4 appeals were allowed. This case however involves Appeal Case No.522 of 1981 arising out of Objection Case No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.