SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 300

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Jaswant Singh, Murahari Sri Raman, JJ.
M/s. P.K. Ores Pvt. Ltd. @ M/s. PK Minings Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner of Sales Tax & Another - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) No. 10335 of 2022
Decided On : 06-05-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Kananbala Roy Choudhury, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sidharth Shankar Padhy, Advocate for CT & GST Organization

Section 80 of the OGST Act does not permit the grant of instalments for self-assessed tax liability shown in any return.

Headnote:

Interest - Tax Liability - OGST Act, 2017 - Section 80 - Rule 158

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to deposit interest levied on belated deposit of admitted tax in instalments under Section 80 of the OGST Act. The Commissioner rejected the application, leading to the petitioner filing a writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Commissioner was justified in rejecting the petitioner's prayer to deposit interest in instalments, as the provision of Section 80 excludes granting instalments for self-assessed tax liability shown in any return.

Issues: The main issue was whether the Commissioner was justified in rejecting the petitioner's request to deposit interest levied on belated tax in instalments under Section 80 of the OGST Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 80 of the OGST Act does not allow for the grant of instalments for self-assessed tax liability shown in any return, and therefore, the Commissioner was justified in rejecting the petitioner's request.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as the court found it devoid of merit.

JUDGMENT :

1. This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode.

2. Assailing the Order dated 8th February, 2022 passed by the Commissioner of CT & GST, Orissa in Revision Case No. BHU-105/G/2021-22 under Section 80 of the Orissa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, “the OGST”) read with Rule 158 of the Orissa Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (for brevity, “the OGST” Rules), directed against the demand of interest for the periods from April, 2019 to December, 2019 raised by the CT&GST Officer, Bhubaneswar-II Circle, Bhubaneswar for belated deposit of admitted tax, the petitioner has approached this Court invoking provisions of Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:

    “(a) Rule NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties as to why the impugned Order under Annexure-4 in absence of any reason, shall not be held to be illegal, arbitrary and violation of Natural Justice.

    (b) And if they fail to show cause or show insufficient cause make the Rule absolute.

    (c) Issue a direction to O.P. to rectify the demand raised vide DRC-07 under Annexure-1.

    (d) And be further pleased to allow the petitioner to pay the admissible interest amount in 24 installments in accordance with law.

    (e) Issue any appropriate order/orders deemed fit in the fact and circumstances of the case.”

3. The case of the petitioner is that in terms of the Section 39 read with Section 59 of the OGST Act, returns for the period 2019-20 in Form GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 have been furnished on self-assessment. While undertaking the scrutiny of said self-assessed returns furnished for each tax periods as per Section 39, the CT & GST Officer noticed that the petitioner has filed the returns belatedly.

4. The petitioner has alleged that non-payment of admitted tax is attributed to non-disbursal of substantial amount standing due from IDCOL, a Government Agency. It is submitted by Ms. Kananbala Roy Choudhury, counsel for the petitioner that as of now, entire tax component stands deposited, though belatedly. Ms. Roy Choudhury advancing argument submitted that the petitioner is not in a position to discharge demand of interest as raised by the CT&GST Organisation on account of such belated deposit of admitted tax. Therefore, the petitioner prayed before the Commissioner of CT&GST, Orissa to allow it to discharge interest demand to the tune of Rs.68,15,506/- by instalments. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made submission that the Commissioner of CT&GST being vested with power under Section 80 of the OGST Act ought not to have rejected its application in Form GST DRC-20 filed in consonance with Rule 158 of the OGST Rules and facilitated the petitioner by allowing it to discharge the liability towards the huge burden of interest. It is submitted at the bar that the rejection of prayer for deposit of interest demand in instalments by the Commissioner of CT&GST is outcome of not only arbitrary exercise of power but misreading of provision of the statute.

5. Per contra, stressing on Annexure-1, i.e., Form GST DRC-07 issued by the CT&GST Officer, Bhubaneswar-II Circle, Bhubaneswar, Sri Sidharth Shankar Padhy, learned Advocate for the CT&GST Organisation submitted that when the statute requires doing certain things in certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all and, thereby other methods or modes of performance are impliedly and necessarily forbidden. Drawing attention of this Court to the heading “issue involved” appearing in Form GST DRC-07 (Annexure-1), Sri Padhy further submitted that, it is explicit from the demand raised by the CT&GST Officer that “Interest has not been paid on delayed payment of tax (paid through cash)”. Sri Padhy, learned Advocate for the CT&GST Organisation referred to the following as stated at Annexure appended to Form GST DRC-07:

    “You are a registered taxpayer under the CGST/OGST Act, 2017 and you have been self-assessed under Section 59 of the aforesaid Act by filing returns in GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 for the tax pe

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top