M. S. RAMAN
Debendranath Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. worker's qualification for regularization. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against eligibility for regularization. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. citing precedent for similar cases. (Para 6) |
| 4. employers' obligation to provide benefits based on long service. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. decision to extend benefits to similar employees. (Para 12 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
'The State to secure a social order for the promotion of the welfare of the people.- The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life.
The State shall, in particular, strive to minimize the inequalities in income, and endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status, P.T.O. facilities and opportunities, not only amongst individuals but also amongst groups of people residing in different areas or engaged in different vocations.'
2. The petitioner-WATCHMAN UNDER THE WORK CHARGED ESTABLISHMENT, as applicant before the Odisha Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.1791 of 2017 filed under Section 19 of the ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT , 1985, which is later renumbered as WPC (OA
Amarkant Rai Vrs. State of Bihar
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vrs. Union of India
Chandra Nandi Vrs. State of Odisha & Others
Khoday Distilleries Limited Vrs. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Limited
Kunhayammed Vrs. State of Kerala
Meera Piri Vrs. State of Orissa and Ors.
Sri Chandra Nandi Vrs. State of Odisha and Others
State of Karnataka and others Vrs. Umadevi and others
State of Karnataka Vrs. M.L. Kesari & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.