IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Murahari Sri Raman, J.
Debendranath Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha & Ors. – Respondents
WPC (OA) No. 1791 of 2017 (in the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)
Decided On : 02-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. worker's qualification for regularization. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against eligibility for regularization. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. citing precedent for similar cases. (Para 6) |
| 4. employers' obligation to provide benefits based on long service. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. decision to extend benefits to similar employees. (Para 12 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
1. This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode.
'The State to secure a social order for the promotion of the welfare of the people.- The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life.
The State shall, in particular, strive to minimize the inequalities in income, and endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status, P.T.O. facilities and opportunities, not only amongst individuals but also amongst groups of people residing in different areas or engaged in different vocations.'
Article 38, the Constitution of India, 1950
2. The petitioner-WATCHMAN UNDER THE WORK CHARGED ESTABLISHMENT, as applicant before the Odisha Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.1791 of 2017 filed under Section 19 of the ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT , 1985, which is later renumbered as WPC (OA) No.1791 of 2017 being transferred to this Court, at the verge of retirement in the year 2017, came up with grievance that his representation to bring his service over to regular establishment was not paid due attention, as a consequence, he would be deprived of service benefit including pensionary benefits. Therefore, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:
'The Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to declare that the action of the respondents in not regularizing the service of the applicant in regular establishment despite of vacancies is illegal and arbitrary;
The Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondent to absorb the service of the applicant in regular establishment prior to date of his superannuation and extend all benefits including pensionary benefits as due admissible to him within a time to be stipulated;
Pass any other relief(s) the Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit and proper for the interest of justice.'
3. The fact as set forth by the petitioner reveals that having qualification of Class IX and being qualified as 'welder' from Industrial Training Institute, he was initially engaged as Nominal Muster Roll (NMR) employee under the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Khurda on 01.12.1983. Since his service along with many others was not regularized, the Employees Union approached the Government. Instead of bringing the petitioner over to regular establishment, he was brought over to work charged establishment at the age of about 53 years having rendered around 33 years of service vide Office Order bearing No.1451/CMIC/Bhubaneswar, dated 23rd April, 2010 (Annexure-2) which runs as follows:
'In pursuance of Lr. No.5330, dated 19.04.2010 of Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Orissa, Bhubaneswar Sri Debendranath Sahoo, NMR is hereby brought over as a watchman under work charged establishment in the scale of pay Rs.4440- 7440 (pay band-1S) with Grade Pay Rs.1,500.00 and other allowances sanctioned by the Government of Odisha from time to time and posted as such under Junior Engineer, M.I. Mech.
Section, Bhubaneswar under Asst. Executive Engineer, S&M (MI) Sub-Division, Bhubaneswar under MI Division, Khurda as is where is basis until further order from his date of joining as a watchman. ***'
3.1. It is claimed by the petitioner that as he complied with the terms and conditions envisaged in the Government of Odisha in Finance Department Resolution dated 15th May, 1997 (Annexure-1) his service is liable to be regularized. The petitioner laid stress on said Resolution which runs as follows:
'No.WFI-24/97-22764/F Government of Orissa Finance Department
***
Resolution Bhubaneswar, dated, the 15th May, 1997
Sub.: Scheme for absorption of NMR/
Amarkant Rai Vrs. State of Bihar
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vrs. Union of India
Chandra Nandi Vrs. State of Odisha & Others
Khoday Distilleries Limited Vrs. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Limited
Kunhayammed Vrs. State of Kerala
Meera Piri Vrs. State of Orissa and Ors.
Sri Chandra Nandi Vrs. State of Odisha and Others
State of Karnataka and others Vrs. Umadevi and others
State of Karnataka Vrs. M.L. Kesari & Ors.
The government has an obligation to recognize the long service of employees and regularize their employment status for pension eligibility, preventing arbitrary discrimination against individuals wit....
Inaction by the State in not regularizing long-serving employees cannot deprive them of valid pension benefits under existing rules, irrespective of completed qualifying service requirements.
The court affirmed that the principle of equal treatment in public employment must be upheld, requiring regularization for long-serving employees despite technical non-compliance with bureaucratic cr....
State delays in regularizing services do not justify withholding pension benefits for long-serving employees; equal treatment and fair engagement practices must be upheld.
Employees serving over ten years without unlawful intervention are entitled to pension benefits, even if prior appointments were irregular. Bureaucratic failure to regularize should not impede legal ....
The duty of the state as an employer to provide pension to employees with long service, and the entitlement of employees to pension after serving for a substantial period.
The court established that eligibility for regularization and pensionary benefits must be determined based on the criteria set forth in applicable regulations, and that such benefits cannot be claime....
The court ruled that employees employed for lengthy periods cannot be denied regularization of service, emphasizing principles of fairness and equality under the Constitution.
(1) Regularisation – Once a policy decision is taken to benefit a defined class, it must be applied uniformly to all who satisfy prescribed conditions.(2) Writ Petition – No adverse finding ought to ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.