Back
M. S. RAMAN
Debendranath Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. worker's qualification for regularization. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against eligibility for regularization. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. citing precedent for similar cases. (Para 6) |
| 4. employers' obligation to provide benefits based on long service. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. decision to extend benefits to similar employees. (Para 12 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
1. This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode.
'The State to secure a social order for the promotion of the welfare of the people.- The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life.
The State shall, in particular, strive to minimize the inequalities in income, and endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status, P.T.O. facilities and opportunities, not only amongst individuals but also amongst groups of people residing in different areas or engaged in different vocations.'
Article 38, the Constitution of India, 1950
2. The petitioner-WATCHMAN UNDER THE WORK CHARGED ESTABLISHMENT, as applicant before the Odisha Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.1791 of 2017 filed und
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
