SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 59

R. K. PATTANAIK
Ratan Kumar Puspureddy @ Ratan Puspureddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Niranjan Maharana, Advocate & Associate, for the Petitioner; Mr. P.K. Rout, AGA, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner assailing the impugned report under Annexure-1 considered in Misc. (Caste Certificate) Appeal Case No.6 of 2019 submitted by opposite party No.4 and for a direction to opposite party No.5 to issue a caste certificate in his favour treating him as a 'PANO HINDU' on the grounds stated therein.

2. In fact, the petitioner has challenged the enquiry report received in connection with the proceeding in Misc. (Caste Certificate) Appeal Case No.6 of 2019. The contention of the petitioner is that proper enquiry has not been held by opposite party No.4 and therefore, the report dated 22nd July, 2019 should not be accepted. It is claimed that the petitioner's family worship Hindu Gods and Goddess and participate in festivals observed by the Hindu community and that apart, the funeral ceremony is being performed by them according to the Hindu rites with the exception in the practice that the dead bodies are not cremated instead buried. The further contention is that manner in which the enquiry was held by opposite party No.4 is perfunctory with the report submitted in Misc. (Caste Certificate) Appeal Case No.6 of 2019 which is, therefo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top