SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Purnima Pattanayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sashikanta Mishra, J.
The order passed by Addl. District Magistrate, Dhenkanal in Appeal (AWW) Case No.2/2017 on 16.09.2017 is impugned in the present writ application.
2. The facts of the case are that the Child Development Project Officer (C.D.P.O.), Odapada (opposite party No.5) issued an advertisement on 21.09.2016 inviting applications from eligible candidates for engagement as Anganwadi Worker for Besalia-1 Additional Anganwadi Center. Pursuant to such advertisement, the petitioner being a resident of the concerned service area, submitted her application along with all relevant documents and certificates. The selection was conducted by the selection committee under the Chairmanship of Sub-Collector, Dhenkanal, wherein the petitioner was selected. The C.D.P.O. issued engagement order in her favour on 19.11.2016, pursuant to which she joined in the center on 25.11.2016. It is stated that she is continuing in the said center. On 05.05.2017, the opposite party No.6 submitted a representation before the Additional District Magistrate (ADM), Dhenknal, which was treated as the aforementioned appeal. Such representation was submitted on the ground that the resident certificate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.