Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Kemati Kharsel – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's appeal process and prior attempts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. state and opposite party's justifications. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of eligibility criteria and argument validity. (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments regarding eligibility based on odia subject. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. conclusion on merit and eligibility. (Para 11) |
| 6. final order directing engagement of the petitioner. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the petitioner’s appeal by the Additional District Magistrate, Bolangir in Revenue Misc. Appeal No.11 of 2011, the petitioner has filed this writ application with the following prayer:
And further be pleased to pass such other order/orders, direction/directions as may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity;
2. Pursuant to an advertisement issued by the Child Development Project Officer (C.D.P.O.), Muribahal for engagement of Anganwadi Workers for Dunguriguda Anganwadi Center on 08.07.2009, the petitioner was an applicant. She was found to have secured the highest marks as per the proceeding of the selection committee meeting held on 07.08.2009, wherein the private opposite party No.4 was placed in the 2nd rank. Howev
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
