Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Kemati Kharsel – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's appeal process and prior attempts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. state and opposite party's justifications. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of eligibility criteria and argument validity. (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments regarding eligibility based on odia subject. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. conclusion on merit and eligibility. (Para 11) |
| 6. final order directing engagement of the petitioner. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.
1. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the petitioner’s appeal by the Additional District Magistrate, Bolangir in Revenue Misc. Appeal No.11 of 2011, the petitioner has filed this writ application with the following prayer:
“It is therefore prayed that this writ petition may be admitted, relevant records relating to selection of Anganwadi Worker at Dunguriguda Addl. AWC, in the file of Opp.Party No.2 & 3 may be called for and after hearing the counsels for both the parties, the writ petition may be allowed, and the order dtd.24/04/2013 passed by the ADM Balangir under annexure-3 may be set-aside/quashed and the Opp.Party No.3 may be directed to appoint the petitioner in the post of Anganwadi worker at Dunguriguda Addl. AWC within a stipulated period;
An
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
