IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, CJ., Murahari Sri Raman, J.
Purusottam Swain - Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha & Ors. - Respondents
W.A. No.2265 of 2023
Decided On : 15-05-2024
Writ Appeal - Employment and Seniority - Article 226, Article 227 of the Constitution of India; Orissa Education (Payment of Grant-in-Aid to High Schools, Upper Primary Schools, etc.) Amendment Order, 2008 - The court discussed the legal framework surrounding employment positions in educational institutions, particularly focusing on the seniority and appointment of peons as per the Amendment Order, 2008. It highlighted that the seniority is determined by the date of entry into service, and the rectification of an earlier approval due to a mistake is permissible. The court concluded that the appellant's claim to the second post of peon was invalid as he was junior to the respondent, and the learned Single Judge's decision was upheld.
JUDGMENT
Murahari Sri Raman, J. -
The challenge:
Challenge has been laid to Judgment dated 09.08.2023 rendered by the learned Single Judge in the writ petition bearing W.P.(C) No.29187 of 2019 and W.P.(C) No.18128 of 2009 in the matters of applications under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner therein, being aggrieved, preferred the intra-Court appeals beseeching to invoke provisions of Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letters Patent constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna and Rule 6 of Chapter-III and Rule 2 of Chapter-VIII of the Rules of the High Court of Orissa, 1948.
2. This matter was on Board on 02.05.2024 under the heading 'Fresh Admission'. Learned Additional Government Advocate has raised objection against entertainment of single writ appeal against common judgment dated 09.08.2023 passed in two writ petitions and submitted that there is little scope for interference with the decision of the learned Single Judge in the writ appeal filed by the appellant-writ petitioner.
3. The facts culled out from the pleadings reveal that in pursuance of Resolution dated 10.01.2001 of the Managing Committee of Nanda Kishore High School, Tilada, Sarugaon in the district of Balasore, the appellant joined on 18.01.2001 against the second post of peon in the said School, which got approved by the Inspector of Schools, Balasore vide Office Order No.2376, dated 28.03.2009 with effect from 01.04.2008.
3.1. However, pursuant to the Orissa Education (Payment of Grant-in-Aid to High Schools, Upper Primary Schools, etc.) Amendment Order, 2008 (for brevity, 'Amendment Order, 2008') vide Order No.23611-IX-SME (Sch)-35/2008-SME, dated 08.12.2008 and with reference to Letter No.63144, dated 18.12.2008 of the Director, Secondary Education, Odisha, the Inspector of Schools by way of Order No.9008, dated 13.10.2009 modified the approval. Consequent thereof, the position of Gayadhar Nayak-respondent No.6 was approved as Science Attendant and the post of appellant-Purusottam Swain, was approved as Night Watchman-cum-Sweeper with effect from 01.04.2008.
3.2. The appellant assailed such modified Order of approval before this Court by way of a writ application, which was registered as W.P.(C) No.18128 of 2009, which came to be dismissed for non-prosecution on 11.07.2017, and subsequently, stood restored vide Order dated 10.01.2019 passed in CMAPL No.344 of 2018.
3.3. As it revealed from the record, an FIR was lodged against the appellant by the Headmaster of the School on 26.09.2018 and on 28.09.2018, a show-cause notice was issued to furnish reply as to why action would not be taken against him for disobedience of the direction to work as Night Watchman-cum-Sweeper in the School. Consequently, Resolution has been passed by the Managing Committee on 10.10.2018 to suspend the appellant, which was placed before the District Education Officer, Balasore for approval.
3.4. It is stated by the appellant that on the last date fixed for filing said show cause reply, he was arrested on 05.10.2018 and got released on bail on 18.10.2018. Thereafter, he could submit his reply on 20.10.2018. Nonetheless, the District Education Officer, Balasore approved the Order of suspension on 28.11.2018.
3.5. Challenging the Order of suspension, the appellant approached this Court in W.P.(C) No.122 of 2019, which was disposed of by an Order dated 07.03.2019 with a direction to consider the representation. The District Education Officer having considered such representation, rejected it by Order dated 20.09.2019.
3.6. The District Education Officer taking note of modified approval Order held in the said Office Order dated 20.09.2019 that:
'Perused the application of the petitioner under Annexure-II, documents/ records available in the files in Resolutions submitted by the Managing Committee of N.K. High School, Tilada.
Sri Purusottam Swain was approved as Peon of the N.K. High School, Tilada, vide Inspectorate Order N
Union of India Vrs. Godfrey Phillips India Ltd.
State of Orissa Vrs. Rajendra Kumar Das (2003) 10 SCO 411 = AIR 2003 SC 1009 = 2004 (I) OLR (SC) 517
Ram Janam Singh Vrs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Oil Seeds Growers Federation Ltd. Vrs. D. Achyuta Rao
N.K Chauhan Vrs. State of Gujrat
Paramjit Singh Vrs. Ram Rakha Mal
A. Janardhana Vrs. Union of India
A.N. Pathak Vrs. Secy. to the Govt., Ministry of Defence
Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officer’s Association Vrs. State of Maharashtra
AI
Seniority in employment is determined by the date of entry into service, and rectification of administrative errors is permissible without infringing on the rights of employees.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that appointments made in accordance with the yardstick and extant rules prescribed by the government are valid and require approval, as held in th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the initial appointment of the appellant on the post of Junior Clerk was illegal due to violation of the relevant provisions of the Maharashtr....
The jurisdiction over disputes related to staff appointments in aided educational institutions lies with the State Education Tribunal, not the Regional Director, especially after the institution has ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following the provisions of Rule 12 of the Maharashtra Employee of Private Schools (Conditions of Services) Regulation Rules, 198....
An appointment is invalid if the candidate has not attained the minimum age requirement at the time of appointment, thus rendering subsequent service approvals unlawful.
The court upheld the Single Judge's decision, emphasizing the importance of seniority and misconduct in determining appointment validity under established legal principles.
The court established that interim orders do not invalidate prior valid selections and that seniority must be determined based on actual service and selection dates.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Education Officer (Secondary) had no jurisdiction to review the earlier order and that the order of promotion to the post of Headmaster de....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.