IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P. ROUTRAY, CHITTARANJAN DASH, JJ.
State of Odisha - Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Mallik - Respondent
DSREF No. 2 of 2024, JCRLA No. 62 of 2024
Decided On : 12-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the criminal case and initial facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. detailed factual account of crimes committed (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. arguments regarding defendant's state of mind and intent (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. legal standards for insanity and defense responsibilities (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. judicial reasoning on insanity plea and conviction validity (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. introduction to sentencing principles and factors (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. examination of mitigating and aggravating factors (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. final decision on sentencing (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. conclusion and orders issued by the court (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
JUDGMENT :
B.P. ROUTRAY, J.
1. Present death sentence reference along with the criminal appeal are arising out of out of the impugned judgment and conviction dated 24th April 2024, convicting the condemned prisoner Nanda @ Niranjan Mallik. He is convicted for commission of offence under Sections 302 , 307, 325, 326, 458 of the IPC and sentenced to capital punishment along with imprisonment for different descriptions and fine. The sentencing part is classified in the following manner:
(i) Sentenced to death for committing offence of murder punishable under Section 302 , IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.
(ii) Sentenced to rigorous imprisonment till end of life and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- for commission of offence of attempt to murder punishable under Section 307 of the IPC. In default to pay the fine amount to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one year.
(iii) Sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- for commission of offence of grievous hurt punishable under Section 325 , IPC. In default to pay the fine amount to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
(iv) Sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- for causing grievous hurt punishable under Section 326 , IPC. In default to pay the fine amount to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months more.
(v) Sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- of committing lurking house trespass punishable under Section 458 of the IPC. In default to pay the fine amount to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months more.
2. According to prosecution case, the occurrence took place in a sequence on the intervening night of 16th and 17th January 2019 started from around 2:00 AM till early morning at different places of Odagaon Town.
3. Odagaon in the district of Nayagarh is a small Sub-Divisional town and the convict, as well as all the victims are residents of said area. In a complete sequence, the convict committed murder of two persons namely, Lochan Sethi (Male) and Badani Pradhan (Female) and injured three more persons namely, Sulochana Pradhan (Female), Amulya Barik (Female) and Dambaru (Male). The deceased, Lochan, was working as a Night Watchman in the vegetable market at Odagaon. On the fateful night intervening between 16th and 17th January 2019, while Lochan was performing his night duty in the vegetable market, the convict all of a sudden appeared with a piece of wooden plank and suddenly hit on his head and other parts of the body. The other watchman (P.W.9) of adjacent Ganesh market rushed towards the spot and then Niranjan (convict) fled away from there. After some time then, when deceased Badani was sweeping front portion of his house, which situates within the compounded premises of Sanjibnee Clinic at Odagaon, the convict suddenly appeared there scaling the wall at around 3:00 PM and dealt a blow on her head. The deceased fell in a pool of blood and died at the spot. Hearing her shout, her daughter Sulochana, who was bathing nearby, rushed shouting at the convict. But she wa
Mohar and another vs. State of U.P.
Hari Singh Gond vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Sherall Walli Mohammed v. State of Maharashtra
Chunni Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Satyavir Singh Rathi, Assistant Commissioner of Police v. State
State of U.P. v. Mohd. Musheer Khan
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar vs. State of Gujarat
Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Machhi Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Laxman Naik Vs. State of Orissa
Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Sundar @ Sundarrajan Vs. State by Inspector of Police
Allauddin Mian and Others Vs. State of Bihar
The direct witness testimony, corroborated by medical reports, confirms the convict's intention in committing multiple murders, justifying capital punishment, while also considering potential for reh....
The court emphasized the necessity of considering mitigating circumstances and the possibility of reformation before imposing the death penalty.
The court upheld that the death penalty is an exception, emphasizing rehabilitation and reformation when sentencing for serious crimes, mandating consideration of the offender's background and potent....
The court ruled that corroborative evidence is essential in murder cases, especially when convicting based on eyewitness testimony.
The court modified the death sentence to life imprisonment without remission for 30 years, emphasizing the need for proportionality in sentencing while acknowledging the heinous nature of the crime.
The court ruled that the death penalty is not warranted as the case does not fall under the 'rarest of rare' category, emphasizing the need for special reasons for such a sentence.
The court held that death sentence should be imposed only in rarest of rare cases considering the possibility of rehabilitation, thereby modifying the sentence to rigorous imprisonment for 20 years.
The court ruled that the death penalty is an exception, emphasizing the need for considering the possibility of reformation and rehabilitation of the accused, leading to a modification of the sentenc....
(1) Constitutional guarantees of equality before law, protection of life and personal liberty, protection in respect of conviction, and protection against arrest and detention, do not expand into a c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.