SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 72

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P. ROUTRAY, CHITTARANJAN DASH, JJ.
State of Odisha - Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Mallik - Respondent
DSREF No. 2 of 2024, JCRLA No. 62 of 2024
Decided On : 12-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Mohanty
For the Respondent: J.K. Panda

The direct witness testimony, corroborated by medical reports, confirms the convict's intention in committing multiple murders, justifying capital punishment, while also considering potential for rehabilitation which resulted in the sentence being commuted to life imprisonment.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 325, 326, 458 - Death sentence reference and criminal appeal against conviction for multiple murders, attempt to murder, and grievous hurts. The convict was sentenced to capital punishment for murder, life imprisonment for attempted murder, and other specific terms for grievous hurt and trespass based on a sequence of violent assaults. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Legal principles - Direct evidence of eyewitnesses concerning the assault and corroborative medical testimony established the homicidal nature of the deaths of the victims. The intent and knowledge of the convict regarding the consequences of his acts were well-established from the facts. (Paras 12-14)

(C) Jurisprudence on Insanity - The court examined if the accused could claim insanity under Section 84 of IPC, ultimately determining no credible evidence substantiated this defense. It confirmed the need for the defense to prove insanity. (Paras 26-32)

(D) Sentencing principles - The court emphasized the necessity of considering mitigating and aggravating factors. It determined death penalty was not suitable due to the convict's potential for rehabilitation, leading to conversion of the death sentence to life imprisonment. (Paras 34-48)

Findings of Court:
Conviction upheld based on credible evidence; sentences amended in light of rehabilitation considerations.

Issues: The Court addressed the nature of the evidence supporting murder convictions, assessment of insanity, and appropriateness of the death penalty versus life imprisonment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that based on the collected evidence, convict's intentional actions justified guilty verdicts; insanity claim unsubstantiated.

Result: Conviction affirmed; death sentence commuted to life imprisonment.

Table of Content
1. overview of the criminal case and initial facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. detailed factual account of crimes committed (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. arguments regarding defendant's state of mind and intent (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. legal standards for insanity and defense responsibilities (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. judicial reasoning on insanity plea and conviction validity (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
6. introduction to sentencing principles and factors (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
7. examination of mitigating and aggravating factors (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
8. final decision on sentencing (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
9. conclusion and orders issued by the court (Para 47 , 48 , 49)

JUDGMENT :

B.P. ROUTRAY, J.

1. Present death sentence reference along with the criminal appeal are arising out of out of the impugned judgment and conviction dated 24th April 2024, convicting the condemned prisoner Nanda @ Niranjan Mallik. He is convicted for commission of offence under Sections 302 , 307, 325, 326, 458 of the IPC and sentenced to capital punishment along with imprisonment for different descriptions and fine. The sentencing part is classified in the following manner:

(i) Sentenced to death for committing offence of murder punishable under Section 302 , IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.

(ii) Sentenced to rigorous imprisonment till end of life and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- for commission of offence of attempt to murder punishable under Section 307 of the IPC. In default to pay the fine amount to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one year.

(iii) Sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- for commission of offence of grievous hurt punishable under Section 325 , IPC. In default to pay the fine amount to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.

(iv) Sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- for causing grievous hurt punishable under Section 326 , IPC. In default to pay the fine amount to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months more.

(v) Sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- of committing lurking house trespass punishable under Section 458 of the IPC. In default to pay the fine amount to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months more.

2. According to prosecution case, the occurrence took place in a sequence on the intervening night of 16th and 17th January 2019 started from around 2:00 AM till early morning at different places of Odagaon Town.

3. Odagaon in the district of Nayagarh is a small Sub-Divisional town and the convict, as well as all the victims are residents of said area. In a complete sequence, the convict committed murder of two persons namely, Lochan Sethi (Male) and Badani Pradhan (Female) and injured three more persons namely, Sulochana Pradhan (Female), Amulya Barik (Female) and Dambaru (Male). The deceased, Lochan, was working as a Night Watchman in the vegetable market at Odagaon. On the fateful night intervening between 16th and 17th January 2019, while Lochan was performing his night duty in the vegetable market, the convict all of a sudden appeared with a piece of wooden plank and suddenly hit on his head and other parts of the body. The other watchman (P.W.9) of adjacent Ganesh market rushed towards the spot and then Niranjan (convict) fled away from there. After some time then, when deceased Badani was sweeping front portion of his house, which situates within the compounded premises of Sanjibnee Clinic at Odagaon, the convict suddenly appeared there scaling the wall at around 3:00 PM and dealt a blow on her head. The deceased fell in a pool of blood and died at the spot. Hearing her shout, her daughter Sulochana, who was bathing nearby, rushed shouting at the convict. But she wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top