Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K.PANIGRAHI
Banajabasini Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accidental death on railways claim (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellants’ strict liability argument (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of claims and evidence (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. interpretation of section 124a and passenger status (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. court orders compensation and sets aside tribunal ruling (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi, J.
1. In this appeal, the appellants seek a direction from this court to set aside the nil award dated 22.04.2021 passed in OA (IIU) No.348 of 2017 by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar and to grant statutory compensation of eight lakh rupees with interest for the accidental death of the deceased.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
(i) The appellants, who are the legal heirs of deceased Sankarshan Pradhan, filed OA (IIU) No. 348/2017 before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar, seeking compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, alleging that the deceased died due to an accidental fall from a running train while travelling from Kharagpur to Jajpur Road. A journey ticket bearing No. UWC-13329357 was stated
A bona fide passenger with a valid ticket is entitled to compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act unless the Railway proves exceptions like suicide or self-inflicted injuries.
Strict liability under Section 124A of the Railways Act mandates compensation for untoward incidents involving bona fide passengers, regardless of negligence claims or absence of tickets.
The court ruled that an accidental falling of a bona fide passenger from a train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under the Railways Act, mandating strict liability for compensation, irrespective o....
The absence of a journey ticket does not negate a claim for compensation under the Railways Act; once prima facie evidence of being a bona fide passenger is established, the burden shifts to the Rail....
The court held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and the incident constituted an ‘untoward incident’ under the Railways Act, thus entitling the claimants to compensation.
The absence of a valid ticket does not negate the status of a bona fide passenger, and the Railway Administration must prove any exceptions to liability under the Railways Act.
The Railway Administration is strictly liable to compensate for deaths from untoward incidents unless exceptions under Section 124A apply; negligence is irrelevant to claim validity.
Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 imposes strict liability on Railways for deaths from untoward incidents, with no requirement for proving negligence or production of a ticket to establish bona ....
The court clarified that a passenger's accidental fall qualifies as an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A, regardless of negligence, mandating compensation for victims.
The Railway Administration is strictly liable to compensate for the death of a bona fide passenger resulting from an untoward incident, irrespective of negligence, provided the incident falls within ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
