SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 588

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Dhaneswar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : J.K. Rath, B. Satapathy
For the Respondent: S.N. Patnaik

Table of Content
1. application for relief against age limit in recruitment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioners rejected due to being over-aged despite qualifications. (Para 4)
3. opposition arguments focus on estoppel and past judgments. (Para 5 , 6)
4. petitioner's arguments challenge changes in age limit. (Para 10 , 11)
5. judicial review on government policy under certain conditions. (Para 12 , 14)
6. court grants relief for unfilled vacancies addressing age issue. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

1. All these Writ Petitions involve common questions of fact and law and being heard together, are disposed of by this common judgment.

3. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following relief:

And/or pass such other order/ orders or direction/directions as deems fit and proper in the interest of justice;

4. The facts of the case, briefly stated, are that the petitioners are all trained graduates and have passed OTET. Pursuant to the resolution dated 26.12.2016 of the Government of Odisha in the School and Mass Education Department for selection/engagement of Sikhya Sahayaks, an advertisement dated 26.12.2016 inviting applications was issued. The number of vacancies so notified was 14087

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top