Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
Baddam Aravind Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Anil Kumar Jukanti, J.
This Writ Petition is filed with the following Prayer:
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the re-settlement and rehabilitation (RR) benefits to me and other petitioners as per G.O.Ms.No.68, irrigation & CAD (project Wing-LA-IV-R&R) Department dt. 8-4-2005 as amended vide G.O.Ms.No.88, irrigation & CAD (PW:LA:IV-R&R) Department dt. 26-8-2010, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to extend all the benefits to the petitioners under the said G.O, and to pass such other or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Heard Mr. N. Hari Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Dara Haritha Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, Ms. Swathi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation & Command Area Development and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition for respondents.
3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners are
Eligibility for rehabilitation benefits hinges on residency status in affected areas as per established policy definitions; administrative decisions backed by valid notifications are enforceable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the PESA Act, Forest Rights Act, and RTFCATILA, RAR Act, 2013 were not applicable to the petitioners' case, and the Orissa Rehabilitation and ....
The clarificatory Notification under Annexure-3, by introducing additional conditions for eligibility to Resettlement and Rehabilitation benefits, was deemed oppressive and could only have prospectiv....
Residency and family status in the affected area are key factors in determining eligibility for Tsunami relief house allotment as per government orders.
The court emphasized that individuals who construct homes on acquired land qualify as displaced families under the Odisha R&R Policy, reinforcing an expansive interpretation in favor of providing emp....
Eligibility determination under PMAY-G must adhere to prescribed guidelines; reopening inquiries based on private complaints without due process undermines applicant rights and the legitimacy of the ....
Authority must consider all relevant factors, including inheritance and residency, when determining eligibility for rehabilitation benefits; a singular focus on revenue records is insufficient and ma....
Welfare legislation must be liberally construed to include grandsons as eligible candidates for employment benefits, ensuring the intended beneficiaries are not excluded.
Claims for ryotwari pattas must comply with statutory requirements; mere representations do not constitute valid claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
