IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K. PATTANAIK, J.
Idris Ali Khan & others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Odisha - Opposite Party
W.P. (C) No.20965 of 2020 with W.P.(C) No. 20967 of 2020
Decided On : 13-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek regularization of services. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of employment and assignments of petitioners. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. state opposes regularization, citing temporary status. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments from both parties regarding regularization. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. legal precedents regarding regularization considered. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. discussion on the implications of long service and legality. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. court’s consideration of petitioners' continuous service. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. court orders regularization process to be initiated. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
R.K. Pattanaik, J.
1. Though separately heard, both the writ petitions are clubbed together since identical question is involved for determination, hence, are disposed of by the following common judgment.
2. The writ petitions are filed by the petitioners seeking regularization of their services as Assistant Software Engineers in Home (Election) Department, Government of Odisha in the scale of pay of Rs. 9,300/- to Rs. 34, 800/- with grade pay of Rs. 4,200/- w.e.f. 2nd June, 2014 on the date completing six years ofservice with consequential benefits in view of the resolution dated 15th February, 2014 of the GA Department with such decision within the stipulated period and in the same manner, as has been allowed in respect of contractual IT personnel in various Government Departments and Establishments in terms of Annexure-1 series and as per the law laid down by the Apex Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka Vrs. Uma Devi (3) and others (2006) 4 SCC 1 and State of Karnataka and others Vrs. M.L. Kesari and others (2010)9 SCC 247 besides a decision of this Court dated 7th August, 2020 in W.P.(C) No.17937 of 2020 and further to direct not to dispense with their services till the decision is taken in that regard.
3. As per the pleadings on record, the petitioners in W.P.(C) No. 20965 of 2020 were selected and employed as the Junior Programmers under a project and their services were extended from time to time till 1st July, 2004 and thereafter, shown to have been engaged under a Chartered Accountant. Such appointments have been in terms of Annexure-1with engagement of the petitioners under Election Photo Identity Card Project. It is further stated that in view of such selection, the petitioners continued in service in the manner allowed and in the meanwhile, on 23rd May, 2008, the Department created six Assistant Software Engineer posts on contractual remuneration of Rs. 12,000/- as per Annexure-2 with the concurrence of the Finance Department, Government of Odisha and in that connection, on 28th May, 2008, the Chief Electoral Officer, Odisha published an advertisement in a local Daily ‘Samaj’ and ‘New Indian Express’ for a walk-in interview to fill up the said posts inviting candidates having MCA qualification with minimum three years of experience in election related IT work under the SLA Project. Upon such advertisement, as per Annexure-3, the selection Committee held interview of 22 candidates including the petitioners on 31st May, 2008 and prepared a select list of six candidates. The proceedings of the meeting of the Selection Committee held on the said date is at Annexure-4, as per which, the petitioners found suitable for engagement as Assistant Software Engineers on contractual basis in the order of merit mentioned therein. Later to the above selection, according to the petitioners, all of them joined as Assistant Software Engineers in Home (Election) Department on 2nd June, 2008. It is further pleaded that in the meantime, the Election Commission of India issued policy guidelines as per Annexure-7 for standardization of ERMS and creation of National Data Base of Electoral Roll and schedule for pre- revision activities indicating therein, the State of Odisha to have been placed in the category of ‘Large State’ with the need and requirement of specified manpower. In the meanwhile, as per the petitioners, the Government of Odish
Vinod Kumar Vrs. Union of India
Amarkant Rai Vrs. State of Bihar and others
Sheo Narain Nagar & others Vrs. State of U.P. and another
The court emphasized that long uninterrupted service in governmental roles, despite initial irregular appointments, warrants consideration for regularization in accordance with established legal prec....
Regularization of services for employees who have served for over ten years is a right that must be considered by the state, provided there are no valid objections, and the state must adhere to its o....
Employment and Service matter - Regularization of service - Absence of any strong justification assigned by respondents, for not regularizing service of petitioner, case of petitioner also needs cons....
The court emphasized the need for regularization of employees appointed irregularly but possessing the prescribed qualifications and working against sanctioned posts, in line with previous judgments.
Prolonged service of over ten years without legal hindrance can qualify employees for regularization, regardless of the initial nature of their appointments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.