Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Dhaneswar Bhoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for pmay house sanction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. b.d.o. finds eligibility for pmay. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's direction for pmay house sanction. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. writ petition allowed in part. (Para 7) |
| 5. final order for expediting pmay process. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the B.D.O., Kantapada, Cuttack (O.P. No.3) for the sanction of a house under Rural Housing, PMAY Scheme in favour of his wife, as his wife is entitled to get the same as per the criterias of that PMAY scheme.
For which, the Petitioner approached this Court by filing this writ petition praying for directing the B.D.O., Kantapada, Cuttack (O.P. No.3) for the sanction of a house under PMAY Scheme in favour of his wife.
“In the meantime, Government in Panchayat Raj & Drinking Water Department has issued guidelines vide letter No.19101/PR and DW, dated 21.08.2024 and as per the said guideline, a survey has been conducted and it is found that, the wife of the Petitioner eligible to enroll in the Survey list under Rural Housing Scheme and accordingly, the name of th
Judicial direction for administrative compliance under welfare schemes is warranted when eligible parties are unduly delayed in receiving benefits as prescribed by government guidelines.
Eligibility for housing under PMAY scheme establishes a right, necessitating action by authorities to avoid unjust delay.
Eligibility for government scheme requires timely action by authorities once established by survey enrollment.
A petitioner must fulfill specific documentation requirements to be eligible for housing benefits under welfare schemes.
The court established that compliance with the PMAY(G) scheme's eligibility criteria is essential for sanctioning benefits, and the presence of valid possession certificates supports the legality of ....
Eligibility determination under PMAY-G must adhere to prescribed guidelines; reopening inquiries based on private complaints without due process undermines applicant rights and the legitimacy of the ....
The court mandated that authorities consider petitioners for benefits under the PMAY-G Scheme in the next phase, emphasizing adherence to eligibility criteria and rectification of administrative erro....
Entitlement to the benefit under the housing scheme based on verification and prescribed procedure.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
