Priya Ranjan Dash vs State of Orissa

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.MURALIDHAR, M.S.RAMAN
Priya Ranjan Dash – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pitambar Acharya, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sudarshan Nanda, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. M.K. Khuntia, A.G.A., Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, Advocate.

Table of Content
1. entitlement to pay scales based on service conditions. (Para 3 , 4)
2. claim of appellants regarding applicable pay scales. (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
3. state guidance and resolutions inconsistent with regulations. (Para 6 , 7 , 11)
4. court's analysis of misapplication of rules. (Para 10 , 12 , 14)
5. court sets aside the previous judgment. (Para 15)
6. direction for implementation of pay scale resolution. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

ORDER :

1. At the outset, Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, learned counsel appearing for the Utkal University clarifies that the Utkal University is withdrawing the counter affidavit, which has been filed in W.A. No.187 of 2018 and is adopting the affidavit filed by it in W.A. No.186 of 2018 for W.A. No.187 of 2018 as well.

3. The background facts are that the Appellants are directly recruited Readers in the Utkal University pursuant to an advertisement published on 22^nd June, 2015. Both the Appellants applied pursuant to the advertisement issued on 22^nd June 2015, by the Registrar, Utkal University and were directly appointed as Readers in the scale of pay of Rs.15600-39,100+ Rs.8,000 AGP. The question that arose for consideration in the writ petitions was whether

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACKS.MURALIDHAR, M.S.RAMANPriya Ranjan Dash – AppellantVersusState of Orissa – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.MURALIDHAR, M.S.RAMAN
Priya Ranjan Dash – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent