IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.MURALIDHAR, C.J., M.S.RAMAN, J.
Priya Ranjan Dash – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa and others – Respondents
W.A.Nos.186 and 187 of 2018
Decided On : 17-11-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to pay scales based on service conditions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. claim of appellants regarding applicable pay scales. (Para 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. state guidance and resolutions inconsistent with regulations. (Para 6 , 7 , 11) |
| 4. court's analysis of misapplication of rules. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. court sets aside the previous judgment. (Para 15) |
| 6. direction for implementation of pay scale resolution. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER :
S. Muralidhar, CJ.
1. At the outset, Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, learned counsel appearing for the Utkal University clarifies that the Utkal University is withdrawing the counter affidavit, which has been filed in W.A. No.187 of 2018 and is adopting the affidavit filed by it in W.A. No.186 of 2018 for W.A. No.187 of 2018 as well.
2. The challenge in the present writ appeals is to a judgment dated 22nd March 2018, of the learned Single Judge dismissing the Appellants’ respective W.P.(C) Nos.1260 and 1261 of 2018.
3. The background facts are that the Appellants are directly recruited Readers in the Utkal University pursuant to an advertisement published on 22nd June, 2015. Both the Appellants applied pursuant to the advertisement issued on 22nd June 2015, by the Registrar, Utkal University and were directly appointed as Readers in the scale of pay of Rs.15600-39,100+ Rs.8,000 AGP. The question that arose for consideration in the writ petitions was whether the Appellants were entitled to the scales of pay as determined by the University Grant Commission (UGC) Regulation of 2010?
4. It must be noticed at the outset that the aforementioned UGC 2010 Regulation came into force with effect from 18th September 2010, superseding the earlier Regulations of 2000. As far as Odisha is concerned, by notification dated 15th February, 2010 pursuant to Section 22 (1) of the Orissa Universities Act, 1989, the Orissa Revised Scales of Pay for University Teachers (UGC scale of pay) Rules, 2010 [‘the 2010 Rules’] were framed and were deemed to have come into force on 1st January, 2006. Rule 7 of the 2010 Rules are relevant for the purposes of the present appeals and reads as under:
"7. Fixation of initial pay in the revised pay structure-
(1) The initial pay of a teacher who elects, or is deemed to have elected under sub-rule (3) of Rule 6 to be governed by the revised pay structure on and from the 1st day of January, 2006 shall, unless in any case the Governor by special order otherwise directs, be fixed separately in respect of his substantive pay in the permanent post on which he holds a lien or would have held a lien, if it had not been suspended, and in respect of his pay in the officiating post held by him in the following manner, namely:-
(i) the pay in the pay band/pay scale will be determined by multiplying the existing basic pay as on the 1st January 2006 by a factor of 1.86 and rounding off the resultant figure to the next multiple of 10;
(ii) if the minimum of the revised pay band/pay scale is more than the amount arrived as per (i) above, the pay shall be fixed at the minimum of the revised pay band/pay scale or as specified in the Tables 1 to 6 annexed to these rules.
(iii) Fixation of pay of Readers who were selected strictly in accordance with the rules and regulation framed by UGC and who were in the post of Readers and have completed 5years of service after 1st day of January, 2006, their pay will be fixed at the minimum of Rs.37,400.
NOTE 1- Where in the existing emoluments exceed the revised emoluments in the cases of any teacher, the difference shall be allowed as personal pay to be observed in future increases in pay.
NOTE 2- Where in the fixation of pay under sub- rule (1) the pay of a teacher who in the existing scale was drawing immediately before 1st day of January 2006 more pay than another teacher junior to him in the same grade in the cadre he belongs gets fixed in the revised pay band at a stage lower than that of such junior, his pay shall be stepped up to the same stage in the revised pay band a
Directly recruited university teachers are entitled to higher pay scales without a five-year service requirement, as per UGC Regulations superseding earlier rules.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the applicability of pay scales is determined by the specific rules and eligibility criteria for different posts, and the doctrine of equal pa....
Homogeneous cadre of Assistant Librarians entitled to uniform pay scales including UGC benefits despite post-new rules regularization, as appointments predated prospective 2010 rules; parity prevents....
Petitioners being similarly situate and discharging similar duties and working in the same cadre could not be given different treatment.
Autonomous institutions receiving public funding must adhere to the principles of equality in pay, ensuring parity for similar job roles under constitutional mandates.
The judgment established the principle that once employees are in one cadre, the distinction between direct recruits and promotees disappears, and no discrimination can be made thereafter in fixing t....
The court ruled that pay fixation withdrawals without due process are illegal, affirming the right to UGC pay scales for petitioners who had exercised their options in accordance with earlier judgmen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.