SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.MURALIDHAR, C.J., M.S.RAMAN, J.
Priya Ranjan Dash – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa and others – Respondents
W.A.Nos.186 and 187 of 2018
Decided On : 17-11-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pitambar Acharya, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sudarshan Nanda, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. M.K. Khuntia, A.G.A., Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, Advocate.

Directly recruited university teachers are entitled to higher pay scales without a five-year service requirement, as per UGC Regulations superseding earlier rules.

Headnote:(A) Utkal University; University Grant Commission (UGC) Regulations, 2010; Orissa Revised Scales of Pay for University Teachers Rules, 2010 - Directly recruited Readers challenging pay scales - Regulations specify that newly recruited Readers do not require five years of service for upsizing to Associate Professor scale - Resolution by State misconstrued the provisions intended for existing Readers. (Paras 3, 5, 15)

(B) Employment Law - Entitlement to pay scales - Direct recruits’ eligibility for higher pay scales not contingent on prior service requirements as clarified by UGC. (Paras 8, 15)

Facts of the case:
The Appellants, directly recruited Readers at Utkal University, contended their entitlement to higher UGC pay scales applicable post-2010; the State’s denial based on five years’ service was challenged.

Findings of Court:
Court found the initial pay structure adopted by the State was inconsistent and upheld the Appellants' claims based on UGC regulations, thus directing rectification and payment of arrears.

Issues: Whether directly recruited Readers were entitled to UGC pay scales without five years of prior service.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Resolution dated 4th April 2016 was based on a misinterpretation of the Rules; direct recruits were not subject to the five-year service requirement.

Result: Writ appeals allowed, Utkal University directed to implement higher pay scales.

Table of Content
1. entitlement to pay scales based on service conditions. (Para 3 , 4)
2. claim of appellants regarding applicable pay scales. (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
3. state guidance and resolutions inconsistent with regulations. (Para 6 , 7 , 11)
4. court's analysis of misapplication of rules. (Para 10 , 12 , 14)
5. court sets aside the previous judgment. (Para 15)
6. direction for implementation of pay scale resolution. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

ORDER :

S. Muralidhar, CJ.

1. At the outset, Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, learned counsel appearing for the Utkal University clarifies that the Utkal University is withdrawing the counter affidavit, which has been filed in W.A. No.187 of 2018 and is adopting the affidavit filed by it in W.A. No.186 of 2018 for W.A. No.187 of 2018 as well.

2. The challenge in the present writ appeals is to a judgment dated 22nd March 2018, of the learned Single Judge dismissing the Appellants’ respective W.P.(C) Nos.1260 and 1261 of 2018.

3. The background facts are that the Appellants are directly recruited Readers in the Utkal University pursuant to an advertisement published on 22nd June, 2015. Both the Appellants applied pursuant to the advertisement issued on 22nd June 2015, by the Registrar, Utkal University and were directly appointed as Readers in the scale of pay of Rs.15600-39,100+ Rs.8,000 AGP. The question that arose for consideration in the writ petitions was whether the Appellants were entitled to the scales of pay as determined by the University Grant Commission (UGC) Regulation of 2010?

4. It must be noticed at the outset that the aforementioned UGC 2010 Regulation came into force with effect from 18th September 2010, superseding the earlier Regulations of 2000. As far as Odisha is concerned, by notification dated 15th February, 2010 pursuant to Section 22 (1) of the Orissa Universities Act, 1989, the Orissa Revised Scales of Pay for University Teachers (UGC scale of pay) Rules, 2010 [‘the 2010 Rules’] were framed and were deemed to have come into force on 1st January, 2006. Rule 7 of the 2010 Rules are relevant for the purposes of the present appeals and reads as under:

"7. Fixation of initial pay in the revised pay structure-

(1) The initial pay of a teacher who elects, or is deemed to have elected under sub-rule (3) of Rule 6 to be governed by the revised pay structure on and from the 1st day of January, 2006 shall, unless in any case the Governor by special order otherwise directs, be fixed separately in respect of his substantive pay in the permanent post on which he holds a lien or would have held a lien, if it had not been suspended, and in respect of his pay in the officiating post held by him in the following manner, namely:-

(i) the pay in the pay band/pay scale will be determined by multiplying the existing basic pay as on the 1st January 2006 by a factor of 1.86 and rounding off the resultant figure to the next multiple of 10;

(ii) if the minimum of the revised pay band/pay scale is more than the amount arrived as per (i) above, the pay shall be fixed at the minimum of the revised pay band/pay scale or as specified in the Tables 1 to 6 annexed to these rules.

(iii) Fixation of pay of Readers who were selected strictly in accordance with the rules and regulation framed by UGC and who were in the post of Readers and have completed 5years of service after 1st day of January, 2006, their pay will be fixed at the minimum of Rs.37,400.

NOTE 1- Where in the existing emoluments exceed the revised emoluments in the cases of any teacher, the difference shall be allowed as personal pay to be observed in future increases in pay.

NOTE 2- Where in the fixation of pay under sub- rule (1) the pay of a teacher who in the existing scale was drawing immediately before 1st day of January 2006 more pay than another teacher junior to him in the same grade in the cadre he belongs gets fixed in the revised pay band at a stage lower than that of such junior, his pay shall be stepped up to the same stage in the revised pay band a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top