Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
K.R.MOHAPATRA
Gokula Naik – Appellant
Versus
Pitambar Naik – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and procedural history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. argument for enforcement of status quo order. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's duty to uphold orders and inherent powers. (Para 8) |
| 4. setting aside previous order and remitting case. (Para 9) |
| 5. directions for expedited trial court proceedings. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
K.R. MOHAPATRA, J.
2. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. The Petitioner in this CMP seeks to assail the order dated 19th May, 2022 (Annexure-4) passed in C.M.A. No.112 of 2021 (arising out of I.A. No.071 of 2020), whereby learned 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Cuttack rejected an application under Section 151 C.P.C. filed by him to implement the order dated 20th January, 2021 passed in I.A. No.1 of 2020 (arising out of C.S. No.477 of 2020) through the Inspector-in-Charge, Dargha Bazar P.S., Cuttack.
3. Office note indicates that notice on Opposite Party No.1 has returned un-served with a postal endorsement 'Addressee left'. Notices on Opposite Party Nos.6 and 7 returned un-served as they refused to accept the same. Further, tracking report of Postal Department discloses that notices on Opposite Party Nos.2 to 5 and 8 to 11 have
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
