Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.MURALIDHAR, CJ., M.S.RAMAN, J.
Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan, Bhubaneswar - Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar and Another – Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 156 of 2013
Decided on : 05-01-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the writ petition is resolved by the common order. (Para 13) |
ORDER :
13. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the common order passed today in W.P.(C) No.6519 of 2012 including the present petition.
The High Court emphasized the necessity for consistent adjudication in related cases, disposing of the writ petition based on an earlier common order.
The court determined the petitions were rendered infructuous, reflecting the principle that ongoing legal actions may lose relevance over time.
The court affirmed that a petition may be reviewed when its underlying orders remain operational and not infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed following order in connected writ petition.
Writ petition disposed as infructuous due to prior order in connected case.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to prior order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
