SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 495

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SAVITRI RATHO
Bhakta Prasad Swain – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.K. Sarangi
For the Respondents: S. Patnaik, A.K. Sahoo

Table of Content
1. allegations of domestic violence. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. settlement of marital dispute. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments for quashing proceedings. (Para 8 , 9)
4. court's inclination to encourage settlements. (Para 10 , 11)
5. inherent powers of the court. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. quashing of criminal proceedings. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

1. I have heard Mr. A.K. Sarangi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. S. Patnaik, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State and Mr. A.K. Sahoo, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

FACTUAL MATRIX

4. After submission of chargesheet, the learned magistrate had taken cognizance of the offences as aforesaid.

6. Opposite Party no 2 has entered appearance through her counsel Mr. A.K.Sahoo. The joint affidavit of the parties has been filed on 26.06.2023, stating that the dispute between them has been settled and they are living together along with their two children in their village and leading a happy conjugal life and if the proceedings were not quashed, they would be put to irreparable loss .

8. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the dispute between the parties has already been settled through the intervention of fami

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top